Skip to main content
Glama
steipete

Claude Code MCP Server

by steipete
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Claude Code MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Claude Desktop API MCP

      mlobo2012
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server that enables Claude Desktop users to access the Claude API directly, allowing them to bypass Professional Plan limitations and use advanced features like custom system prompts and conversation management.
      1
      34
      -

    • Desktop Commander MCP

      MrGNSS
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server that lets Claude desktop app execute terminal commands on your computer and edit files through Model Context Protocol, featuring command execution, process management, and advanced file operations.
      19
      158,647 npm
      6
      MIT

    • MCP Command Server

      Andrew-Beniash
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure server that allows LLM applications like Claude to execute whitelisted system commands with user confirmation and comprehensive security features.
      -

    • MCP Claude Code

      SDGLBL
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that implements Claude Code-like functionality, allowing the AI to analyze codebases, modify files, execute commands, and manage projects through direct file system interactions.
      15
      304
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no risk of confusion between tools. The single tool's description is broad but unambiguous in its role as a versatile assistant.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    There is only one tool, so naming consistency is perfect by default. No inconsistencies exist.

    Tool Count2/5

    The server has only one tool despite covering a very wide scope (file ops, code, git, terminal, web, GitHub). This monolithic approach is too few tools for the apparent scope, making it hard for agents to understand capabilities and potentially leading to oversimplification.

    Completeness4/5

    The single tool claims to handle file operations, code analysis, git workflows, terminal commands, web search, and GitHub integration, covering a broad range of development tasks. Minor gaps may exist (e.g., detailed permissions or specific API endpoints), but overall the surface is comprehensive for a developer assistant.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources