Skip to main content
Glama
stefanstranger

avm-mcp-server

by stefanstranger
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to avm-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCPfinder by mcpfinder

      MCPfinderofficial

      mcpfinder
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      AI-first MCP server discovery tool that enables agents to search, inspect, and install MCP servers from multiple registries.
      12
      AGPL 3.0

    • MCP Advisor

      stucchi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI assistants browse, search, and discover MCP servers from the MCP Advisor registry. Provides tools for searching servers, fetching details, and getting install instructions for various clients.
      49 PyPI
      MIT

    • openapi-mcp

      ceski23
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for loading and exploring OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, enabling AI assistants to dynamically browse API contracts by loading specs, searching endpoints, inspecting schemas, and retrieving operations.
      11 npm
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    list_avm_modules and scrape_avm_module_details have clearly distinct purposes: one lists modules with metadata, the other extracts detailed sections from a module's README. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: list_avm_modules and scrape_avm_module_details. The naming is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the surface feels thin for a server dedicated to Azure Verified Modules. While the tools are useful, the count is borderline minimal for a full-featured interaction.

    Completeness4/5

    The two tools cover listing modules and extracting detailed documentation, which are the core read operations. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no search by resource type) but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources