Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to net-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to retrieve structured network information, including routing, interfaces, MPLS, and topology, from devices using gNMI and OpenConfig models. It facilitates real-time network analysis, log filtering, and status monitoring through a standardized interface.
      10
      14
      BSD 3-Clause
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for on-demand network diagnostics, providing DNS lookups with DNSSEC checks, ping, traceroute, TCP port checks, HTTP checks, TLS certificate inspection, WHOIS, and ASN lookups.
      12
      41 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes live network monitoring data as Resources and diagnostic capabilities as Tools, letting AI assistants query network health conversationally.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides AI assistants with professional-grade network analysis capabilities, combining Wireshark packet analysis, nmap scanning, and threat intelligence for enhanced network troubleshooting and security analysis.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 39 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have a clear, distinct target and data source, and descriptions explicitly call out differences (e.g., dns_lookup vs local_dig). A few pairs overlap in concept (bgp_prefix_origin vs bgp_route_lookup, local_mtr vs local_ping/local_traceroute), but the descriptions are enough to disambiguate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are all lowercase snake_case and consistently use a domain-prefix pattern (rpki_*, bgp_*, irr_*, peeringdb_*, local_*). The tails mix verbs and plain nouns (lookup, validate, info, hijacks, public_ip), so it is not a uniform verb_noun scheme, but it is predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    39 tools is beyond the 25+ threshold and presents a heavy selection surface, even though the tools are organized into distinct clusters. The broad network scope justifies more than a typical server, but the count strains agent decision-making.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers core workflows across IP planning, DNS, BGP, RPKI, IRR, PeeringDB, and local diagnostics with no serious dead ends. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no RDAP abstraction or multi-vantage-point probing), but the covered domains feel substantially complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues