Skip to main content
Glama
stedwick

codecov-mcp-server

by stedwick
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to codecov-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • test-coverage-mcp

      goldbergyoni
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides instant, token-efficient test coverage data for any programming language, allowing agents to query coverage summaries and track session progress.
      48 npm
      41
      MIT

    • test-intel-mcp

      barissozudogru
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Test coverage intelligence MCP server for TypeScript and JavaScript projects. Analyzes coverage reports to find untested functions, computes cyclomatic complexity, and suggests test cases locally.
      4
      38 npm
      3
      MIT

    • dotnet-coverage-mcp

      Hyeonu-Cha
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants direct access to .NET test-coverage tooling, enabling them to run tests, parse Cobertura XML, identify uncovered branches, diff coverage between runs, and append test code.
      1
      MIT

    • coverage-mcp

      ProgrammerDream
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Java branch coverage analysis using JaCoCo. Enables agent-style coverage feedback with per-test-class granularity and uncovered line identification.
      2
      -

    • test-trust

      rrudy9
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that performs mutation testing and diff scoping to score how trustworthy tests are for detecting regressions in changed code.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clear and unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'get_commit_coverage_totals' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is descriptive. With only one tool, consistency is trivially satisfied, but the name itself is well-formed.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool is far too thin for a Codecov MCP server, which typically would need multiple operations (commits, branches, reports, etc.). The server appears to be scoped too narrowly.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool only provides commit coverage totals with file breakdown. Many obvious Codecov features are missing (e.g., coverage by branch, pull request, or trend analysis), creating significant gaps for most use cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources