Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Site Audit MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP server that audits websites for AI search readiness, providing deterministic scoring (0-100) and prioritized fix lists for metrics like JSON-LD, llms.txt, heading hierarchy, and AI crawler access.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing SuperAudit’s free website audit as a callable tool, enabling AI agents to audit any public URL and receive scores across SEO, security, legal, performance, and more. No API key required; respects rate limits and caches results.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to perform comprehensive web audits using Google Lighthouse with 13+ tools for performance, accessibility, SEO, and security analysis.
      11
      1,975 npm
      75
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes 14 fecklesspleb Apify Actors (job boards, Hacker News, SEO audit, metadata, web tools) as tools; runs bill per result to the caller's own Apify account.
      10
      433 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      MCP server for website SEO + GEO analysis. Scan any URL to get scores across 5 categories (SEO, GEO, Performance, Security, Accessibility) with actionable fix recommendations. Enables AI coding assistants to audit websites and implement fixes autonomously.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct audit targets: accessibility, tech stack, PageSpeed, page changes, and pay transparency. The two AI-related audits could be mildly confused because both inspect AI/SEO signals and robots.txt cues, but their descriptions distinguish structured-data readiness from crawler access.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set mostly follows an action_noun pattern: audit_*, detect_*, monitor_*. Minor deviations appear in longer names like audit_schema_ai_readiness and audit_ai_crawler_access, and audit_pagespeed embeds a product name, but the convention remains readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a site-audit server: enough to cover multiple audit categories without overwhelming an agent. Each tool appears to earn its place as a distinct audit or monitoring capability.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers many important public-site audit areas: structured data/AI readiness, accessibility, tech stack, PageSpeed, AI crawler access, page-change monitoring, and pay-transparency screening. Some common site-audit checks are absent, such as general on-page SEO metadata, broken links, redirects, and security headers, but agents can work around these gaps for the core workflows shown.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues