Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Engram

Engram

by staticroostermedia-arch
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Rust
Local

mcp_engram_rebuild_bvh

Rebuild the BVH index for large manifolds on demand to enable full-quality recall.

Instructions

On-demand BVH build for large manifolds when ENGRAM_DEFER_BVH=1. Spawns a background thread; poll get_backend_readiness until bvh_ready=true, then recall uses full_bvh_gpu. Expect several minutes + RAM spike on 100k+ blocks — run only when you need quality recall.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "mcp_engram_rebuild_bvh"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.7.0-beta.2

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully discloses behavior: background thread spawning, need to poll readiness, time and memory spikes. This enables safe agent invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences front-load key actions and warnings. No filler; every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers trigger, process, polling step, outcome, and performance impact. Complete for a no-parameter tool with no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so baseline 4 applies. Description adds no parameter info as none are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (rebuild), resource (BVH), and context (large manifolds with ENGRAM_DEFER_BVH=1). It distinguishes from siblings by specifying on-demand background build, contrasting with other recall tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit condition for use ('when you need quality recall'), a polling workflow, and performance expectations. Could mention when not to use (e.g., small datasets) but offers sufficient guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools