Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to local-coder

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Codex to delegate scoped coding tasks to DeepSeek Harness subagents over MCP using the official ACP, then wait for results, resume the same session with corrections, and forward permission requests. Read-only and workspace-write modes let results be reviewed and independently verified before acceptance.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Codex to delegate selected tasks to a locally installed DeepSeek Harness through MCP tools for execution, status, planning, and feedback while keeping orchestration local.
      7 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to work on a local machine through an MCP connection by inspecting projects, editing files, running bounded terminal and Git commands, driving Chrome or Edge, and reading or writing an already-connected Excel workbook. It invokes the Codex model explicitly only when a task genuinely needs it, so ordinary local tool actions consume no Codex model usage.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables ChatGPT to operate authorized local projects through MCP, including reading and modifying code, viewing Git changes, running configured programs, and reading local Codex sessions to continue work.
      53 npm
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there are no overlapping purposes or risk of selecting the wrong tool. The tool's purpose is clearly stated and unique within this server.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name uses a clear, descriptive verb-target structure: delegate_to_local_coder. With no other tools to conflict with, there is no naming inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool feels too thin for the broad local-coding scope described, which includes inspecting files, patching code, creating files, running tests, and checking diffs. The entire capability set is buried behind one opaque delegation endpoint.

    Completeness3/5

    The delegate tool covers task handoff and appears to return results for review, but there are no separate tools for status, cancellation, or finer-grained control of coding operations. This makes the surface usable for simple flows but incomplete for managing the full lifecycle of delegated work.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues