Skip to main content
Glama
starfetch-js

Starfetch

Official
by starfetch-js
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Starfetch

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-vizier

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and query tens of thousands of astronomical catalogues from CDS VizieR, including metadata search, cone searches, and object lookups.
      182 npm
      MIT

    • aqc-mcp

      inoribea
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides tools to query 17+ astronomical databases (e.g., SIMBAD, VizieR, Gaia) via HTTP/TAP APIs, enabling AI applications to access astronomical data through natural language.
      23
      17 npm
      2
      BSD 3-Clause

    • Astro MCP

      SandyYuan
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides unified natural language access to 40+ astronomical databases and surveys including DESI, SIMBAD, SDSS, and Gaia, enabling researchers to search, retrieve, and analyze astronomical data without learning complex APIs.
      6
      -

    • mcp-simbad

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying the SIMBAD astronomical database for object resolution, script execution, ADQL TAP queries, and cone searches using natural language.
      1 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct TAP workflow step—service discovery, metadata inspection, synchronous query, or async job lifecycle—and the descriptions clearly separate near-neighbors like availability vs capabilities and query vs submit_job. No two tools appear interchangeable.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share a consistent starfetch_ prefix and snake_case style, but the suffix pattern is mixed: list_presets and submit_job use verb-noun order, registry_search and job_wait/fetch/delete use noun-verb order, and availability/capabilities/tables/columns are bare nouns. The grouping is readable, but verb placement is not uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well-scoped for a TAP client; each tool covers a necessary step from service discovery and metadata inspection through synchronous queries and async job cleanup. There is no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main TAP workflow comprehensively: discovery, capabilities, tables, columns, synchronous queries, and async job lifecycle. Minor gaps such as missing explicit job abort/cancel or job listing exist, but agents can work around them using wait and delete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources