Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Starfetch

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides tools to query 17+ astronomical databases (e.g., SIMBAD, VizieR, Gaia) via HTTP/TAP APIs, enabling AI applications to access astronomical data through natural language.
      13
      2
      BSD 3-Clause
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides unified natural language access to 40+ astronomical databases and surveys including DESI, SIMBAD, SDSS, and Gaia, enabling researchers to search, retrieve, and analyze astronomical data without learning complex APIs.
      6
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying the SIMBAD astronomical database for object resolution, script execution, ADQL TAP queries, and cone searches using natural language.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying NASA Exoplanet Archive data using ADQL TAP, planet search, composite parameters, Kepler candidates, and microlensing events.
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely explore and query databases across SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MSSQL, with schema introspection, natural language queries, and data profiling.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct TAP workflow step—service discovery, metadata inspection, synchronous query, or async job lifecycle—and the descriptions clearly separate near-neighbors like availability vs capabilities and query vs submit_job. No two tools appear interchangeable.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share a consistent starfetch_ prefix and snake_case style, but the suffix pattern is mixed: list_presets and submit_job use verb-noun order, registry_search and job_wait/fetch/delete use noun-verb order, and availability/capabilities/tables/columns are bare nouns. The grouping is readable, but verb placement is not uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well-scoped for a TAP client; each tool covers a necessary step from service discovery and metadata inspection through synchronous queries and async job cleanup. There is no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main TAP workflow comprehensively: discovery, capabilities, tables, columns, synchronous queries, and async job lifecycle. Minor gaps such as missing explicit job abort/cancel or job listing exist, but agents can work around them using wait and delete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues