Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Errorbook MCP

Errorbook MCP

by stardustlil
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Errorbook MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Bruin

      sawzhang
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agents to read, write, and organize notes in a local-first, human-in-the-loop note-taking app.
      3 npm
      2
      MIT
    • Wenlan

      Wenlanofficial

      wenlan-app
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first personal wiki and memory server for AI agents. MCP clients can capture knowledge, retrieve context, read and maintain source-backed wiki pages, and carry project context between sessions.
      33
      116
      Apache 2.0

    • supragnosis

      Ashon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that lets coding agents record what they learn as provenance-carrying observations, retrieve and traverse that shared project memory, and keep contradictory claims side by side for human mediation. It enables opt-in peer sync of a workspace across machines, with every assertion keeping its source, basis, and computed trust tier.
      Apache 2.0

    • Zero Brain MCP Server

      miru-zero
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing a local, domain-agnostic knowledge base using Markdown notes with frontmatter. Enables AI agents to capture, read, search, link, and maintain notes with atomic writes and privacy controls.
      13
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: problem CRUD, review recording, priority adjustment, status changes, export management, and statistics. No two tools have overlapping purposes; even get_problem vs search_problems are clearly differentiated by fixed ID vs. criteria-based search.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, such as create_problem, record_review, list_exports. There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs, making the API highly predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the ideal range for a domain-specific MCP server. Each tool serves a clear purpose in the error book workflow, from problem creation to review sheets and export management, without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: create, read, update, search, review, priority, status, exports, and statistics. Archiving via set_problem_status addresses the absence of deletion, and get_problem can include review history, so there are no critical gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data

    Resources