mind-mem
MIND-Mem is a deterministic AI memory system: recall is defined by the query, admitted corpus, configuration, scoring instant, and execution providers. With those inputs held constant, its canonical audit/evidence encoding is byte-identical across replay; ranking scores themselves remain standard floating-point. The Q16.16 fixed-point audit chain is embedded in every applied decision.
scoring_instant is a UTC date and is the honest part of that claim: recency ranking is load-bearing for a coding agent, so it is not deleted, it is named. Omit it and it resolves to today in UTC — the one clock read on the whole path, taken once at the boundary, never inside the scoring loop. Its resolved value is bound into the recall attestation, so any attested run replays exactly by passing that date back.
Built on the MIND substrate. Governed-write (propose → review → approve_apply). 107 MCP tools as the surface — but the differentiator is the substrate underneath. On the same workspace, recall uses the query, admitted corpus, configuration, scoring_instant, and execution providers. With those inputs held constant, the canonical audit/evidence encoding is byte-identical across replay; ranking scores remain standard floating-point, so this does not promise universal cross-provider result identity.
Most memory layers ship tools. That is table-stakes. MIND-Mem ships a substrate: Q16.16 fixed-point encoding in the audit-hash preimage, a governance pipeline that rejects every unreviewed write, and an audit chain where every applied proposal is hash-anchored. The scoring path itself is pure Python (mind_kernels.py): the wheel ships MIND-language kernel sources under mind/ and no compiled kernel, and the optional native libmindmem.so is built from lib/kernels.c (C99). The substrate claim is the encoding, the gate and the chain — not the kernels, which are not compiled yet. The same query on the same workspace with the same admitted corpus, configuration, scoring instant and execution providers produces repeatable ranked recall; that recall's canonical audit/replay encoding is byte-identical under those held-constant conditions. That property is what makes MIND-Mem suitable as a canonical memory layer across heterogeneous agent stacks.
If your agent runs for weeks, it will drift. MIND-Mem prevents silent drift.
MIND-Mem powers the Memory Plane of the MIND Cognitive Kernel — the deterministic AI runtime architecture.
30-Second Demo
pip install mind-mem
mind-mem-init ~/my-workspace # Create workspace
mind-mem-recall -q "API decisions" --workspace ~/my-workspace # Hybrid BM25F search
mind-mem-scan ~/my-workspace # Detect drift & contradictionsOutput:
[1.204] D-20260215-001 (decision) — Use async/await for all API endpoints
decisions/DECISIONS.md:11
[1.094] D-20260210-003 (decision) — REST over GraphQL for public API
decisions/DECISIONS.md:20Current release: v5.0.4 (candidate; publication pending) — corrects lifecycle ranking and graph admission, strengthens release validation, and adds source-only training preparation. See CHANGELOG.md for candidate changes and published release history.
Substrate Properties
Property | What it means |
Byte-identical replay | Replay fixes the query, admitted corpus, configuration, |
Governed-write | Nothing reaches the source of truth without |
Auditable | Every apply logged with timestamp, receipt, and DIFF. Full traceability from signal to decision. |
Deterministic | No ML in the retrieval core. Q16.16 fixed-point encoding in the audit-hash preimage. The same preimage produces the same hash. |
Local-first | The default retrieval path stores data locally. External storage and model providers are optional and must be configured. |
No vendor lock-in | Plain Markdown files. Move to any system, any time. |
Zero infrastructure | Core requires only Python 3.10+ stdlib. Postgres, Redis, Docker, and GPU are opt-in extras. |
100% NIAH | 250/250 Needle In A Haystack retrieval, every needle/depth/size — full-matrix repro package committed, first-party verified; no independent reproduction yet (EVIDENCE.md row 1). |
Table of Contents
Deep-dive docs
docs/setup.md— install, configure, wire MCP, opt in to MIND native kernelsdocs/usage.md— every surface (MCP tools by category,mmCLI,mind-mem-verify, Python library) with worked examplesdocs/client-integrations.md— 20 AI client integrations (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Grok Build, Vibe, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, aider, OpenClaw, NanoClaw, NemoClaw, Continue, Cline, Roo, Zed, Copilot, Copilot CLI, Cody, Qodo) withmm install-allauto-detectiondocs/task-frames.md— task frames + the dead-end registry:[TF-...]multi-session continuity (resume_brief,mm resume) and[DE-...]negative action-space memory, matched by a deterministic declarative overlap that warns and never blocksdocs/review.md—mm review: batch approval for the HITL queue — pending proposals with their pre-apply diff, provenance, chain status and staleness inline, approved or rejected many at once through the governedapprove_applypath, with no auto-approve at any risk leveldocs/mind-mem-4b-setup.md— download + run thestar-ga/mind-mem-4bfull-FT model locally (transformers, exllamav2, vLLM, llama.cpp, Ollama, MindLLM)docs/companion-tools.md— companion tools that complement (not compete with) mind-mem: MindLLM (STARGA, commercial) for deterministic + evidence-chained inference, GitNexus for code knowledge-graphROADMAP.md— feature roadmap (genuinely-open items at the top; bulk of v3.2.0→v4.0.0 shipped)docs/specs/retrieval-receipt-contract.md— draft portable retrieval-evidence contract and acceptance gates; optional billing and settlement remain demand-gatedCHANGELOG.md— release notes for every published version
Related MCP server: umo-memory
Why MIND-Mem
Most memory plugins store and retrieve. That's table stakes.
MIND-Mem also detects when your memory is wrong — contradictions between decisions, drift from informal choices never formalized, dead decisions nobody references, orphan tasks pointing at nothing — and offers a safe path to fix it.
Problem | Without MIND-Mem | With MIND-Mem |
Contradicting decisions | Follows whichever seen last | Flags, links both, proposes fix |
Informal chat decision | Lost after session ends | Auto-captured, proposed to formalize |
Stale decision | Zombie confuses future sessions | Detected as dead, flagged |
Orphan task reference | Silent breakage | Caught in integrity scan |
Scattered recall quality | Single-mode search misses context | Hybrid BM25+Vector+RRF fusion finds it |
Ambiguous query intent | One-size-fits-all retrieval | 9-type intent router optimizes parameters |
Novel Contributions
MIND-Mem introduces several techniques not found in existing memory systems:
Technique | What's new | Why it matters |
Co-retrieval graph | PageRank-like score propagation across blocks frequently retrieved together | Surfaces structurally relevant blocks with zero lexical overlap (+2.0pp accuracy) |
Fact card sub-block indexing | Atomic fact extraction → small-to-big retrieval with parent score blending | Catches fine-grained facts that full-block BM25 misses (+2.6pp accuracy) |
Adaptive knee cutoff | Score-drop-based truncation instead of fixed top-K | Eliminates noise that hurts LLM judges — returns 3-15 results adaptively |
Hard negative mining | Logs BM25-high / cross-encoder-low blocks as misleading, penalizes in future queries | Self-improving retrieval: precision increases over time without retraining |
Deterministic abstention | Pre-LLM confidence gate using 5-signal scoring (entity, BM25, speaker, evidence, negation) | Prevents hallucinated answers to unanswerable questions — no ML required |
Governance pipeline | Contradiction detection + drift analysis + safe apply with audit trail | Detects contradictions and drift before a change is applied, and keeps the audit trail |
Agent-agnostic shared memory | Single MCP workspace shared across Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Zed | Memory compounds across tools instead of fragmenting |
Features
Hybrid BM25+Vector Search with RRF Fusion
Thread-parallel BM25 and vector search with Reciprocal Rank Fusion (k=60). Configurable weights per signal. Vector is optional — works with just BM25 out of the box.
RM3 Dynamic Query Expansion
Pseudo-relevance feedback using JM-smoothed language models. Expands queries with top terms from initial result set. Falls back to static synonyms for adversarial queries. Zero dependencies.
9-Type Intent Router
Classifies queries into WHY, WHEN, ENTITY, WHAT, HOW, LIST, VERIFY, COMPARE, or TRACE. Each intent type maps to optimized retrieval parameters (limits, expansion settings, graph traversal depth).
A-MEM Metadata Evolution
Auto-maintained per-block metadata: access counts, importance scores (clamped to [0.8, 1.5] reranking boost), keyword evolution, and co-occurrence tracking. Importance decays with exponential recency.
Deterministic Reranking
Four-signal reranking pipeline: negation awareness (penalizes contradicting results), date proximity (Gaussian decay), 20-category taxonomy matching, and recency boosting. No ML required.
Optional Cross-Encoder
Drop-in ms-marco-MiniLM-L-6-v2 cross-encoder (80MB). Blends 0.6 * CE + 0.4 * original score. Falls back gracefully when unavailable. Enabled via config.
MIND Kernel Sources and Configuration
The mind/ directory contains 26 .mind files: 18 INI-style pipeline
configurations and eight MIND-language tensor-source prototypes. The
configuration files are parsed by mind_ffi.py; the source prototypes are
migration work and are not a native serving backend. See
docs/MIND_CONFIG_VS_MIND_LANG.md for the
verified split. The pure-Python scoring logic in
src/mind_mem/mind_kernels.py remains authoritative. An optional C library
implements the existing native scoring ABI when a compatible library is
provided.
MIC/MAP — MIND IR graph serialization
Pure-Python codec for the STARGA wire formats: mic@2 (line-oriented
text, LLM-readable, git-friendly) and MIC-B (varint binary, ~4×
smaller). Both encode typed dataflow graphs (symbols + types + values +
output) with byte-identical round-trip. Streaming parser for bounded peak
memory; optional Cython accelerator via mind-mem[accelerated]
(+16/+20/+36 % on parse). Two MCP tools (mic_convert, mic_inspect) and
a mm mic CLI surface it for agents and operators. See
docs/mic-map.md. Note that the canonical IR per
RFC 0021 is mic@1 text + mic@3 binary (see
mindlang.dev/docs/mic); the mic@2/MIC-B
codec mind-mem ships is the back-compat lineage.
BM25F Hybrid Recall
BM25F field-weighted scoring (k1=1.2, b=0.75) with per-field weighting (Statement: 3x, Title: 2.5x, Name: 2x, Summary: 1.5x), Porter stemming, bigram phrase matching (25% boost per hit), overlapping sentence chunking (3-sentence windows with 1-sentence overlap), domain-aware query expansion, and optional 2-hop graph-based cross-reference neighbor boosting. Zero dependencies. Fast and deterministic.
Graph-Based Recall
2-hop cross-reference neighbor boosting — when a keyword match is found, blocks that reference or are referenced by the match get boosted (1-hop: 0.3x decay, 2-hop: 0.1x decay). Surfaces related decisions, tasks, and entities that share no keywords but are structurally connected. Auto-enabled for multi-hop queries.
Vector Recall (optional)
Pluggable embedding backend — local ONNX (all-MiniLM-L6-v2, no server needed) or cloud (Pinecone). Falls back to BM25 when unavailable.
Persistent Memory
Structured, validated, append-only decisions / tasks / entities / incidents with provenance and supersede chains. Plain Markdown files — readable by humans, parseable by machines.
Immune System
Continuous integrity checking: contradictions, drift, dead decisions, orphan tasks, coverage scoring, regression detection. Structural validation via validate.sh / validate_py (17 checks on a fresh workspace; the count grows with the blocks present).
Safe Governance
All changes flow through graduated modes: detect_only → propose → enforce. Apply engine with snapshot, receipt, DIFF, and automatic rollback on validation failure.
Adversarial Abstention Classifier
Deterministic pre-LLM confidence gate for adversarial/verification queries. Computes confidence from entity overlap, BM25 score, speaker coverage, evidence density, and negation asymmetry. Below threshold → forces abstention without calling the LLM, preventing hallucinated answers to unanswerable questions.
Auto-Capture with Structured Extraction
Session-end hook detects decision/task language (27 patterns with confidence classification), extracts structured metadata (subject, object, tags), and writes to SIGNALS.md only. Never touches source of truth directly. All signals go through /apply.
Tool-Output Offload (v4.2.0)
A single cargo test / pytest / build run dumps 10k–50k lines into an agent's context — the biggest single token sink for coding agents. mm tool-run -- <cmd> stores the full output out-of-context (a tool_outputs sibling table; SQLite by default, reuses the Postgres connection with no new DB) and returns only a compact {handle, summary}; mm tool-recall <handle> returns the full text on demand. The summary is bounded regardless of input (a 10 MB line or 100k error lines can't blow it up), fail-safe (the full text is always stored and every truncation is explicit and counted — a failure line is never silently dropped), and deterministic (pure pattern extraction, no LLM; versioned config). See docs/tool-output-architecture.md.
Concurrency Safety
Cross-platform advisory file locking (fcntl/msvcrt/atomic create) protects all concurrent write paths. Stale lock detection with PID-based cleanup. Zero dependencies.
Compaction & GC
Automated workspace maintenance: archive completed blocks, clean up old snapshots, compact resolved signals, archive daily logs into yearly files. Configurable thresholds with dry-run mode.
Observability
Structured JSON logging (via stdlib), in-process metrics counters, and timing context managers. All scripts emit machine-parseable events. Controlled via MIND_MEM_LOG_LEVEL env var.
Multi-Agent Namespaces & ACL
Workspace-level + per-agent private namespaces with JSON-based ACL. fnmatch pattern matching for agent policies. Shared fact ledger for cross-agent propagation with dedup and review gate.
Automated Conflict Resolution
Graduated resolution pipeline: timestamp priority, confidence priority, scope specificity, manual fallback. Generates supersede proposals with integrity hashes. Human veto loop — never auto-applies without review.
Write-Ahead Log (WAL) + Backup/Restore
Crash-safe writes via journal-based WAL. Full workspace backup (tar.gz), git-friendly JSONL export, selective restore with conflict detection and path traversal protection.
Transcript JSONL Capture
Scans Claude Code transcript files for user corrections, convention discoveries, bug fix insights, and architectural decisions. 16 transcript-specific patterns with role filtering and confidence classification.
MCP Server (107 tools, 8 resources)
Full Model Context Protocol server with 107 distinct tools and 8 read-only resources (6 static + 2 templated). Works with Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible client. HTTP and stdio transports; HTTP requires bearer-token auth (fail-closed) — see Token Auth (HTTP). v3.8.11 added mic_convert_tool / mic_inspect_tool (MIC/MAP wire format); v3.9.0 added compile_truth_walkthrough, recall_with_persona, pipeline_status, and reindex_dirty; v3.11.0 added validate_block, block_lineage, and add_block_edge (deterministic quality gates + typed lineage edges).
Structural Validation + 12,624 Test Functions
validate.sh checks schemas, cross-references, ID formats, status values, supersede chains, ConstraintSignatures, and more. The repository contains 12,624 test functions across the core and optional surfaces; collected case counts also depend on parametrization, optional dependencies and test selectors.
Audit Trail
Every applied proposal logged with timestamp, receipt, and DIFF. Full traceability from signal → proposal → decision.
Calibration Feedback Loop
Per-block quality tracking with Bayesian weight computation. When users provide feedback (thumbs up/down) via calibration_feedback, the system maintains a rolling quality score per block over a 30-day window. Bayesian smoothing constrains calibration weights to the 0.5-1.5 range, preventing any single block from dominating or being silenced. Calibration weights integrate directly into the BM25 + FTS5 retrieval pipeline — high-quality blocks rank higher, low-quality blocks are naturally demoted. Use calibration_stats to inspect per-block quality distributions and global calibration health. With v4.llm_noise_profile enabled (default off), it also carries an llm_reliability section: a per-provider, per-domain reliability EMA fed by report_outcome and persisted to intelligence/llm_profiles.json. Reliability is evidence for an operator reading the record — nothing on the retrieval scoring path reads it.
LLM-Guided Multi-Query Expansion
Generates semantically diverse query reformulations before search — synonym expansion, specificity shifts, temporal rephrasing, and negation variants. Combines all reformulated queries with Reciprocal Rank Fusion for broader recall without sacrificing precision. Runs locally with zero API calls.
4-Layer Search Deduplication
Post-retrieval dedup pipeline: best-chunk-per-source (keeps highest-scoring chunk from each file), cosine similarity dedup (>0.85 threshold), type diversity capping (max 3 results per block type), and per-source chunk limiting. Eliminates redundant results that waste LLM context.
LLM-Guided Smart Chunking
Content-aware chunking that splits at semantic boundaries (headers, paragraph breaks, list items, code blocks) instead of fixed character counts. Produces variable-size chunks with overlap for continuity. Supports markdown, code, and prose with format-specific splitting rules.
Compiled Truth Pages
Per-entity knowledge compilation: current-best-understanding on top, timestamped evidence trail below. Contradiction detection across evidence entries with automatic flagging. Entities accumulate knowledge from all sessions — each new evidence entry is checked against existing facts.
Dream Cycle (Autonomous Memory Enrichment)
Scheduled background enrichment: scans recent memory for missing cross-references, broken citations, orphan entities, and consolidation opportunities. Generates repair proposals for stale links, detects implicit entities not yet formalized, and compacts redundant entries. Runs during idle periods with configurable depth.
Feature Completeness Matrix
Cells were checked against each project's public source or, where the engine is closed (Supermemory's engine, Graphlit), its official docs, in October 2026. Several retrieval legs exist in other projects only behind an optional backend; see the Full Feature Matrix below.
Columns: MM MIND-Mem · M0 Mem0 · SM Supermemory · CM claude-mem · Le Letta · Zep Zep · LM LangMem · Co Cognee · GL Graphlit · CW ClawMem · MU MemU · En Engram · BM Basic Memory
Cells: ✓ present · ◐ partial or a different mechanism · opt present but off by default · — looked for and not found · n/v not verified (closed engine or undocumented) · N/A not applicable · ↓n see note n under the table. Small notes under each table carry the qualifiers.
Recall
Capability | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
BM25 lexical | ✓ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ |
Vector semantic | opt | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ |
Hybrid fusion1 | opt | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | — | — | ◐ |
Cross-encoder | opt | opt | opt | — | ◐ | ✓ | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | opt |
Intent routing2 | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | ◐ | — | ✓ | — | — | — |
Query expansion3 | ✓ | — | ◐ | — | — | — | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | — | — | — |
Graph boost4 | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | — | — | ◐ | — | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | — | — | ◐ |
Fact sub-blocks | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | — | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | — | ✓ |
Hard negatives | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Knee cutoff | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | — | — | ◐ | — | — | — | ◐ | — | — | ◐ |
Multi-query + RRF | ✓ | — | ◐ | — | — | — | ◐ | ◐ | — | ✓ | — | — | — |
Search dedup5 | ✓ | ◐ | n/v | ◐ | — | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | n/v | ✓ | — | ◐ | ◐ |
Semantic chunking | ✓ | — | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | — | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
1 MIND-Mem: BM25+vector+RRF2 MIND-Mem: 9 types3 MIND-Mem: RM34 MIND-Mem: co-retrieval PageRank5 MIND-Mem: 4 layers
Persistence
Capability | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
Truth pages1 | ✓ | — | ◐ | ◐ | — | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | — | — |
Background enrichment2 | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | opt | ✓ | — | — |
Backup/restore3 | ✓ | ◐ | — | ◐ | ◐ | — | — | — | — | — | — | ◐ | ◐ |
1 compiled, per entity2 MIND-Mem: dream cycle3 with zip-slip protection
Integrity
Capability | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
Contradictions | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | — | ◐ | — | ◐ | — |
Drift analysis | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ◐ | ◐ |
Governance
Capability | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
Propose/apply1 | ✓ | — | ◐ | — | — | — | — | ◐ | ◐ | — | — | — | — |
Shared memory2 | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ |
1 governance pipeline2 several agents can read and write one store, via MCP or API. The Full Feature Matrix row "Multi-agent" is stricter: per-agent identity and isolation (◐ = shared store without per-agent isolation)
Operations
Capability | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
Zero core deps | ✓ | — | n/v | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ✓ | — |
Local-only1 | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ |
Native C scorer2 | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ◐ | ◐ | — | ◐ |
1 no cloud required2 optional backend
Integrations are the substrate working
MIND-Mem provides integrations for 20 supported clients, including 12 MCP-aware clients. They can share a governed memory workspace. Reproducing a recall result requires the same request, corpus, configuration, scoring instant and execution dependencies; the client count alone does not establish cross-client output identity.
Honest positioning: the integrations below are software-level — clients use their configured MCP connection or local integration. They are not commercial-customer relationships with any vendor. Full positioning policy:
docs/integrations.md.
Native integration with 20 clients (12 MCP-aware clients)
pip install mind-mem
mm install-allmm install-all auto-detects every supported client on your machine
and writes the appropriate config file for each. MIND-Mem speaks the
Model Context Protocol — any
MCP-compatible client connects with one command.
Client | Vendor |
| MCP config written |
Claude Code | Anthropic |
| No (instructions/hooks only) |
Codex CLI | OpenAI |
| Yes |
Grok Build CLI | xAI |
| Yes |
Vibe (Mistral CLI) | Mistral AI |
| Yes |
OpenCode (1.x / 2.x) | OpenCode (open source) |
| Yes |
Gemini CLI |
| Yes | |
Cursor | Anysphere |
| Yes |
Windsurf | Cognition (formerly Codeium) |
| Yes |
aider | Aider-AI (open source) |
| No (instructions/hooks only) |
OpenClaw | OpenClaw Foundation (open source) |
| No (instructions/hooks only) |
NanoClaw | NanoClaw / Qwibit (open source) |
| No (instructions/hooks only) |
NemoClaw | NVIDIA |
| No (instructions/hooks only) |
Continue | Continue.dev |
| Yes |
Cline | Cline |
| Yes |
Roo Code | Roo Code |
| Yes |
Zed | Zed Industries |
| Yes |
GitHub Copilot (workspace instructions) | GitHub / Microsoft |
| No (instructions/hooks only) |
GitHub Copilot CLI | GitHub / Microsoft |
| Yes |
Cody | Sourcegraph |
| No (instructions/hooks only) |
Qodo Gen | Qodo |
| No (instructions/hooks only) |
Compatible with major LLM providers
MIND-Mem's recall pipeline is provider-agnostic: any MCP-capable client or
OpenAI-compatible endpoint can use the same server interface. The provider
adapters (Anthropic; OpenAI-compatible, which Mistral and other OpenAI-style
APIs route through; Ollama; vLLM; llama.cpp) are covered by mocked contract
tests, which make no live call. The
only model-in-the-loop benchmark run so far is LoCoMo, with
mistral-large-latest as answerer and judge. We do not claim live testing
against specific versions of other vendors' models. Replay also requires the
same query, admitted corpus, configuration, scoring instant, execution
providers and dependencies; different client models can generate different
queries.
Production usage at STARGA
MIND-Mem is the daily-driver memory layer across STARGA's active
projects, including mind, mindlang.dev, mind-inference, and
arch-mind. First-party, verifiable in our own commit history.
What we do not claim
❌ "OpenAI / Microsoft / Anthropic / Google is a customer" — false. These are software-level MCP integrations, not commercial relationships.
❌ "Used by N production teams outside STARGA" — we have no telemetry. PyPI download counts measure installs, not active use.
If a future integration becomes a real commercial relationship (signed contract, paid pilot, named reference), it will appear in the press release first — not in the README.
Benchmark Results
MIND-Mem's recall engine evaluated on standard long-term memory benchmarks using multiple configurations — from pure BM25 to full hybrid retrieval with neural reranking.
Needle In A Haystack (NIAH)
250/250 — 100% retrieval across all haystack sizes, burial depths, and needle types.
Provenance. The full-matrix repro package is committed at
benchmarks/repro/niah/(raw per-case rows, recomputed metrics, and a manifest pinning the commit, config, seeds and hardware — produced on a clean tree,repo_tracked_files_dirty_at_run: false).make repro-verifyrecomputes the 250/250 headline from those raw rows rather than trusting the manifest's summary. This is first-party evidence: nobody outside STARGA has re-run it yet and reported the samemetrics.determinism.decision_fingerprint— see EVIDENCE.md row 1 for exactly what "verified" does and does not mean here.
A single fact is planted at a controlled depth within a haystack of semantically diverse filler blocks. The system must retrieve the needle in its top-5 results using only a natural-language query.
Haystack Size | Depths Tested | Needles | Passed | Rate |
10 blocks | 0/25/50/75/100% | 10 | 50/50 | 100% |
50 blocks | 0/25/50/75/100% | 10 | 50/50 | 100% |
100 blocks | 0/25/50/75/100% | 10 | 50/50 | 100% |
200 blocks | 0/25/50/75/100% | 10 | 50/50 | 100% |
500 blocks | 0/25/50/75/100% | 10 | 50/50 | 100% |
Config: Hybrid BM25 + all-MiniLM-L6-v2 + RRF (k=60) + sqlite-vec. Full details: benchmarks/NIAH.md
LoCoMo LLM-as-Judge
Same pipeline as Mem0 and Letta evaluations: retrieve context, generate answer with LLM, score against gold reference with judge LLM. Directly comparable methodology.
Canonical flagship number: the full 10-conversation (1986-question) BM25 run directly below (Overall Acc>=50 73.8%, Mean 70.5) — see
docs/benchmarks.mdfor scope, evidence, and reproduction. All other LoCoMo tables on this page are smaller historical subsamples, kept for their per-category detail — do not treat any of them as the headline number.
v1.0.7 — Hybrid + top_k=18 (external LLM answerer + judge, conv-0 subsample, 199 of 1986 questions — 10% of the full set; no raw per-question artifact is checked into this repo for this run):
Category | N | Acc (>=50) | Mean Score |
Overall | 199 | 92.5% | 76.7 |
Adversarial | 47 | 97.9% | 89.8 |
Multi-hop | 37 | 91.9% | 74.3 |
Open-domain | 70 | 92.9% | 72.7 |
Temporal | 13 | 92.3% | 76.2 |
Single-hop | 32 | 84.4% | 68.9 |
Pipeline: BM25 + Qwen3-Embedding-8B (4096d) vector search → RRF fusion (k=60) → top-18 evidence blocks → observation compression → answer → judge. A/B validated: +2.8 mean vs top_k=10 baseline.
v1.1.1 — BM25 + top_k=18 (canonical — full dataset) (external LLM answerer + judge, 10 conversations, 1986 questions):
Category | N | Acc (>=50) | Mean Score |
Overall | 1986 | 73.8% | 70.5 |
Adversarial | 446 | 92.4% | 87.2 |
Single-hop | 282 | 80.9% | 68.7 |
Open-domain | 841 | 71.2% | 70.3 |
Temporal | 96 | 66.7% | 65.9 |
Multi-hop | 321 | 50.5% | 51.1 |
Pipeline: BM25 + RM3 query expansion → top-18 evidence blocks → observation compression → answer → judge. Full 10-conversation benchmark with the same external LLM as both answerer and judge.
v1.0.0 — BM25-only baseline (external LLM answerer + judge, 10 conversations):
Category | N | Acc (>=50) | Mean Score |
Overall | 1986 | 67.3% | 61.4 |
Open-domain | 841 | 86.6% | 78.3 |
Temporal | 96 | 78.1% | 65.7 |
Single-hop | 282 | 68.8% | 59.1 |
Multi-hop | 321 | 55.5% | 48.4 |
Adversarial | 446 | 36.3% | 39.5 |
Key improvements since v1.0.0: Adversarial accuracy tripled from 36.3% to 92.4% via abstention classifier + hybrid retrieval. Overall Acc≥50 improved from 67.3% to 73.8% (+6.5pp).
Competitive Landscape (LoCoMo)
Full 10-conversation (1986-question) LoCoMo, Acc>=50 — apples-to-apples scope
and metric. Canonical MIND-Mem table + evidence:
docs/benchmarks.md.
On this metric MIND-Mem is not the top score — Memobase and Letta report
slightly higher, both on cloud infrastructure with embedding + vector-DB
dependencies. MIND-Mem's differentiator is not "wins every cell"; it's being
the only local-only, zero-core-dependency, governed system in the table —
governance (contradiction detection, drift analysis, proposal/review/apply
audit trail, byte-identical replay) is a property no other row has, and it
is not measured by this benchmark at all.
System | LoCoMo Acc>=50 (full 10-conv, 1986Q) | Infrastructure | Dependencies |
Memobase¹ | 75.8% | Cloud + GPU | embeddings + vector DB |
Letta¹ | 74.0% | Cloud | embeddings + vector DB |
MIND-Mem (BM25) | 73.8% | Local-only | Zero core |
Full-context¹ | 72.9% | N/A | LLM context window |
Mem0 (own LoCoMo paper)² | 66.9% | Cloud (managed) | graph DB + embeddings |
¹ Third-party self-reported numbers (Letta's August 2025 analysis — see "Why Plain Files Outperform Fancy Retrieval" below). Not re-run by MIND-Mem, and not measured under a shared contract: different hardware, different judge configuration, and each system's own harness. Rows in this table are therefore indicative of scope, not a head-to-head result, and none of them — including ours — has been reproduced by the others. A genuine comparison requires every system run under one adapter contract on one box with a pinned judge and >=2 reps; that run does not exist yet, and until it does no ordering in this table should be read as a ranking.
² 66.88 is Mem0's own published LoCoMo-paper number. Mem0's separate 2026
managed platform self-reports 91.6 on LoCoMo — a different setup/judge
(hosted product, not the open-paper config), not apples-to-apples with this
table. Surfaced rather than omitted, per policy: never publish a comparison
a skeptic could catch as cherry-picked.
LongMemEval-S
The previous headline (
R@5 = 85.3) is retracted, not held — it had no committed artifact, was not reproducible after two attempts, and its own per-category rows summed to 376 under a stated N=470. It is replaced by the measurement below, which ships with per-question NDJSON so anyone can recompute it. Seebenchmarks/STATUS.mdandbenchmarks/REPORT.md.
Full eligible set (470 of 500; 30 abstention questions excluded), two reps identical per
question, artifacts under docs/benchmarks/2026-09-03-longmemeval-s-full-*.
Configuration: BM25F/SQLite with the vector leg OFF — one leg of the product, not the
shipped hybrid. The hybrid number does not exist yet and nothing here may be read as one.
adapter | recall_any@5 | recall_all@5 (official) | MRR |
| 0.9404 | 0.8170 | 0.8776 |
| 0.9702 | 0.8298 | 0.9081 |
Paired over the same 470 question ids: on the official strict protocol
(recall_all@5) the two are statistically indistinguishable (McNemar exact, p=0.4799);
the zero-dependency baseline is better on the lenient protocol (recall_any@5, p=0.0043)
and on MRR (p=0.0013). An independent audit refuted every artefact explanation — the
recall caps are genuinely off in the pinned config, there is no ingest truncation, and
index fragment ids never reach recall — so the deficit is ordering quality, not
candidate recall. That is the work in flight; we publish the number that exists rather
than the one we want.
Performance (Latency & Throughput)
Measured on a single developer workstation (commodity x86-64, warm cache, single process) against a 65-block workspace (typical personal workspace) with the SQLite FTS5 backend. Absolute latencies are hardware-dependent — the portable claim is the O(log N) scaling noted below, not the millisecond figures. These figures come from a single-workstation run; no committed artifact backs them yet and make repro-verify does not cover them:
Operation | Metric | Value |
Query (FTS5 + rerank) | p50 latency | 2.1 ms |
Query (FTS5 + rerank) | p95 latency | 4.9 ms |
Query (FTS5 + rerank) | mean latency | 2.6 ms |
Incremental reindex | elapsed | 32 ms (13 blocks indexed) |
Full index build | elapsed | 48 ms (65 blocks) |
MCP tool overhead | stdio round-trip | < 15 ms |
Memory footprint | RSS (idle MCP server) | ~28 MB |
Query latency scales as O(log N) with SQLite FTS5 (vs O(corpus) for scan backend). The co-retrieval graph adds < 1ms per query. Knee cutoff and fact aggregation add negligible overhead (< 0.5ms).
Feedback-Quality -> Downstream-Success (synthetic, deterministic)
Downstream-success prediction (synthetic, deterministic): starved 0.00 -> sufficient 1.00 at matched budget. 48-episode regression gate over the v4.7.0 per-hit feedback-quality credit + v4.8.0 recall-sufficiency score; see benchmarks/REPORT.md and benchmarks/feedback_success_bench.py.
Run Benchmarks Yourself
# Retrieval-only (R@K metrics)
python3 benchmarks/locomo_harness.py
python3 benchmarks/longmemeval_harness.py
# LLM-as-judge (accuracy metrics, requires API key)
python3 benchmarks/locomo_judge.py --dry-run
python3 benchmarks/locomo_judge.py --answerer-model <your-answerer-model> --output results.json
# Hybrid retrieval with any model pair (BM25 + vector + cross-encoder)
python3 benchmarks/locomo_judge.py --hybrid --compress --answerer-model <your-answerer-model> --judge-model <your-judge-model> --output results.json
# Selective conversations
python3 benchmarks/locomo_harness.py --conv-ids 4,7,8Install in 3 commands
pip install mind-mem
mm install-all --force # auto-wires every detected AI CLI
mm install-model # downloads mind-mem-4b GGUF + imports to OllamaFull options + Postgres setup + troubleshooting: docs/install-guide.md
Quick Start
One-line install (recommended)
pipx install "mind-mem[mcp]"
mind-mem-mcp --help # smoke-testpipx keeps MIND-Mem in its own venv, exposes the mind-mem-mcp console
script on PATH, and avoids polluting your system Python. If you don't have
pipx, pip install --user "mind-mem[mcp]" works too.
Then wire it into every AI coding client on your machine:
git clone https://github.com/star-ga/mind-mem.git
cd mind-mem
./install.sh --all --no-install # Already installed via pipx, just wire clientsOr do both in one shot (the installer will auto-pick pipx if available, else fall back to pip):
git clone https://github.com/star-ga/mind-mem.git
cd mind-mem
./install.sh --all./install.sh wires the MCP server into a fixed set of eight clients:
Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Windsurf, Zed and
OpenClaw. Each client launches the same mind-mem-mcp binary, so all agents
share one workspace.
For the full set of 20 clients (12 of them get an MCP config), use
mm install-all after installing the package; it auto-detects what is on
your machine and writes these files:
Client | Config Location | Format |
Claude Code ( |
| JSON (hooks) |
Codex CLI ( |
| Markdown block + TOML |
Grok Build CLI ( |
| Markdown block + TOML |
Vibe (Mistral CLI) ( |
| Markdown block + TOML |
OpenCode (1.x / 2.x) ( |
| Markdown block + JSON |
Gemini CLI ( |
| JSON |
Cursor ( |
| Markdown block + JSON |
Windsurf ( |
| Markdown block + JSON |
aider ( |
| YAML |
OpenClaw ( |
| JSON (hooks) |
NanoClaw ( |
| JSON (hooks) |
NemoClaw ( |
| JSON (hooks) |
Continue ( |
| JSON |
Cline ( |
| Markdown block + JSON |
Roo Code ( |
| Markdown block + JSON |
Zed ( |
| JSON |
GitHub Copilot (workspace instructions) ( |
| Markdown block |
GitHub Copilot CLI ( |
| Markdown block + JSON |
Cody ( |
| JSON |
Qodo Gen ( |
| Markdown block |
Cline and Roo Code: the installer writes the VS Code Server (remote / WSL) settings tree,
~/.vscode-server/data/User/. Desktop VS Code keeps its user settings elsewhere (for example~/.config/Code/User/on Linux), and those paths are not written yet; add the MCP entry there by hand for now.
Selective install:
./install.sh --claude-code --codex --gemini # Only specific clients
./install.sh --all --workspace ~/my-project/memory # Custom workspace pathUninstall:
./uninstall.sh # Remove from all clients (keeps workspace data)
./uninstall.sh --purge # Remove everything including workspace dataManual Setup
For manual or per-project setup:
1. Clone into your project
cd /path/to/your/project
git clone https://github.com/star-ga/mind-mem.git .mind-mem2. Initialize workspace
PYTHONPATH=.mind-mem/src python3 -m mind_mem.init_workspace .
# or, after `pip install -e .mind-mem`: mind-mem-init .Creates the directory tree, the template files and the mind-mem.json config. Never overwrites existing files.
3. Validate
bash .mind-mem/src/mind_mem/validate.sh .
# or cross-platform:
PYTHONPATH=.mind-mem/src python3 -m mind_mem.validate_py .Expected: 0 issues (17 checks on a fresh workspace; warnings for empty sections are normal).
4. First scan
PYTHONPATH=.mind-mem/src python3 -m mind_mem.intel_scan .Expected: 0 critical | 0 warnings on a fresh workspace.
5. Verify recall + capture
PYTHONPATH=.mind-mem/src python3 -m mind_mem.recall --query "test" --workspace .
# → No results found. (empty workspace — correct)
PYTHONPATH=.mind-mem/src python3 -m mind_mem.capture .
# → capture: no daily log for YYYY-MM-DD, nothing to scan (correct)6. Add hooks (optional)
Option A: Claude Code hooks (recommended)
Merge into your .claude/hooks.json:
{
"hooks": [
{
"event": "SessionStart",
"command": "bash .mind-mem/hooks/session-start.sh"
},
{
"event": "Stop",
"command": "bash .mind-mem/hooks/session-end.sh"
}
]
}Option B: OpenClaw hooks (for OpenClaw 2026.2+)
cp -r .mind-mem/hooks/openclaw/mind-mem ~/.openclaw/hooks/mind-mem
openclaw hooks enable mind-mem7. Smoke Test (optional)
bash .mind-mem/src/mind_mem/smoke_test.shCreates a temp workspace, runs init → validate → scan → recall → capture → pytest, then cleans up.
Health Summary
After setup, this is what a healthy workspace looks like:
$ python3 -m mind_mem.intel_scan .
mind-mem Intelligence Scan Report v2.0
Mode: detect_only
=== 1. CONTRADICTION DETECTION ===
OK: No contradictions found among 25 signatures.
=== 2. DRIFT ANALYSIS ===
OK: All active decisions referenced or exempt.
INFO: Metrics: active_decisions=17, active_tasks=7, blocked=0,
dead_decisions=0, incidents=3, decision_coverage=100%
=== 3. DECISION IMPACT GRAPH ===
OK: Built impact graph: 11 decision(s) with edges.
=== 4. STATE SNAPSHOT ===
OK: Snapshot saved.
=== 5. WEEKLY BRIEFING ===
OK: Briefing generated.
TOTAL: 0 critical | 0 warnings | 16 infoCommands
Command | What it does |
| Run integrity scan — contradictions, drift, dead decisions, impact graph, snapshot, briefing |
| Review and apply proposals from scan results (dry-run first, then apply) |
| Search across all memory files with ranked results (add |
The three skills above live in skills/.
Agent skill: CLI user manual
Agents that prefer the shell over MCP can install a mind-mem skill that works
as a user manual for the mm CLI. Its SKILL.md
is a table of contents — what mind-mem is, which command to run for which job,
and how governed writes work — and it points to reference files the agent opens
only when it needs them:
Reference | Covers |
Install, workspaces, wiring clients, upgrading, removing | |
Every | |
| |
| |
When to use which, and the MCP-tool-to-command map | |
Basic questions about the product |
mm skill install # -> ~/.claude/skills/mind-mem
mm skill install --target ~/.codex/skills # any agent that reads SKILL.md foldersThe skill ships inside the package. tests/test_skill_manual.py fails the build
if a documented command, flag, environment variable or config key stops
existing, and python3 scripts/gen_skill_cli_reference.py regenerates the CLI
reference after the parser changes.
Architecture
your-workspace/
├── mcp_server.py # MCP server (FastMCP, 107 tools, 8 resources)
├── mind-mem.json # Config
├── MEMORY.md # Protocol rules
│
├── mind/ # 26 .mind files: 18 INI config + 8 MIND sources
│ ├── README.md # Source/config inventory and migration status
│ ├── bm25.mind # MIND-language source prototype
│ ├── rrf.mind # MIND-language source prototype
│ ├── ranking.mind # MIND-language source prototype
│ └── recall.mind # INI pipeline configuration example
│
├── lib/ # Optional native C scoring backend
│ └── libmindmem.so # Locally built from lib/kernels.c; not bundled
│
├── decisions/
│ └── DECISIONS.md # Formal decisions [D-YYYYMMDD-###]
├── tasks/
│ └── TASKS.md # Tasks [T-YYYYMMDD-###]
├── entities/
│ ├── projects.md # [PRJ-###]
│ ├── people.md # [PER-###]
│ ├── tools.md # [TOOL-###]
│ └── incidents.md # [INC-###]
│
├── memory/
│ ├── YYYY-MM-DD.md # Daily logs (append-only)
│ ├── intel-state.json # Scanner state + metrics
│ └── maint-state.json # Maintenance state
│
├── summaries/
│ ├── weekly/ # Weekly summaries
│ └── daily/ # Daily summaries
│
├── intelligence/
│ ├── CONTRADICTIONS.md # Detected contradictions
│ ├── DRIFT.md # Drift detections
│ ├── SIGNALS.md # Auto-captured signals
│ ├── IMPACT.md # Decision impact graph
│ ├── BRIEFINGS.md # Weekly briefings
│ ├── AUDIT.md # Applied proposal audit trail
│ ├── SCAN_LOG.md # Scan history
│ ├── proposed/ # Staged proposals + resolution proposals
│ │ ├── DECISIONS_PROPOSED.md
│ │ ├── TASKS_PROPOSED.md
│ │ ├── EDITS_PROPOSED.md
│ │ └── RESOLUTIONS_PROPOSED.md
│ ├── applied/ # Snapshot archives (rollback)
│ └── state/snapshots/ # State snapshots
│
├── shared/ # Multi-agent shared namespace
│ ├── decisions/
│ ├── tasks/
│ ├── entities/
│ └── intelligence/
│ └── LEDGER.md # Cross-agent fact ledger
│
├── agents/ # Per-agent private namespaces
│ └── <agent-id>/
│ ├── decisions/
│ ├── tasks/
│ └── memory/
│
├── mind-mem-acl.json # Multi-agent access control
├── .mind-mem-wal/ # Write-ahead log (crash recovery)
│
└── src/mind_mem/
├── mind_ffi.py # MIND FFI bridge (ctypes)
├── hybrid_recall.py # Hybrid BM25+Vector+RRF orchestrator
├── block_metadata.py # A-MEM metadata evolution
├── cross_encoder_reranker.py # Optional cross-encoder
├── intent_router.py # 9-type intent classification (adaptive)
├── recall.py # BM25F + RM3 + graph scoring engine
├── recall_vector.py # Vector/embedding backends
├── sqlite_index.py # FTS5 + vector + metadata index
├── connection_manager.py # SQLite connection pool (WAL read/write separation)
├── block_store.py # BlockStore protocol + MarkdownBlockStore
├── corpus_registry.py # Central corpus path registry
├── abstention_classifier.py # Adversarial abstention
├── evidence_packer.py # Evidence assembly and ranking
├── intel_scan.py # Integrity scanner
├── apply_engine.py # Proposal apply engine (delta-based snapshots)
├── block_parser.py # Markdown block parser (typed)
├── capture.py # Auto-capture (27 patterns)
├── compaction.py # Compaction/GC/archival
├── mind_filelock.py # Cross-platform advisory file locking
├── observability.py # Structured JSON logging + metrics
├── namespaces.py # Multi-agent namespace & ACL
├── conflict_resolver.py # Automated conflict resolution
├── backup_restore.py # WAL + backup/restore + JSONL export
├── transcript_capture.py # Transcript JSONL signal extraction
├── validate.sh # Structural validator (shell)
└── validate_py.py # Structural validator (Python, cross-platform)How It Compares
Quick Comparison
Feature | MIND-Mem | Mem0 | Letta | Zep/Graphiti | Engram | Basic Memory |
Local-only | Yes | Parta | Self-hostb | Self-hostc | Yesd | Yese |
Zero infrastructure | Yes | Partf | No | No | Yesg | Yes |
Hybrid retrieval | BM25F + vector + RRF | Semantic + BM25 + entity, additiveh | Vectori | Graph + BM25 + vector, RRF / cross-encoder | FTS5 only | FTS5 + vector, score fusion |
Governance (propose/review/apply) | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
Contradiction detection | Yes | Platform onlyj | LLM prompt only | Yesk | Agent-judged | No |
Test functions | 12,624 test functions | - | - | - | - | - |
LoCoMo benchmark (full 10-conv, Acc>=50)¹ | 73.8% | 66.9%² | 74.0% | - | - | - |
MCP tools | 107 distinctl | Hostedm | Client only | 13 | 23 | 27 |
Core dependencies | 0 | Many | Many | Many | 0n | Many |
a Mem0, Local-only: OSS can run locally; defaults to a cloud LLMb Letta, Local-only: heavy runtimec Zep/Graphiti, Local-only: graph DB + LLMd Engram, Local-only: cloud optionale Basic Memory, Local-only: cloud optionalf Mem0, Zero infrastructure: library mode; needs LLM + embedderg Engram, Zero infrastructure: single Go binaryh Mem0, Hybrid retrieval: no RRFi Letta, Hybrid retrieval: BM25 + RRF only with Turbopufferj Mem0, Contradiction detection: Dreamk Zep/Graphiti, Contradiction detection: LLM-basedl MIND-Mem, MCP tools: mcp.tool registrations; recall dispatcher shadows base recallm Mem0, MCP tools: Platformn Engram, Core dependencies: single binary
¹ Canonical MIND-Mem LoCoMo number — see
docs/benchmarks.md
for scope/evidence. On this apples-to-apples metric MIND-Mem is not the top
score of every system evaluated (see the Competitive Landscape table above);
its differentiator is being the only local-only, zero-dependency, governed
option.
² Mem0's own published LoCoMo-paper number. Mem0's separate 2026 managed platform self-reports 91.6 on a different setup/judge — not apples-to-apples with this row.
At a Glance
Tool | Strength | Trade-off |
Managed platform plus self-hostable OSS; semantic + BM25 + entity retrieval; user/agent/run scoping | Graph memory, Dream and hosted MCP are platform-only; OSS writes go straight in with no review | |
Knowledge graph with supersession, optional reranking, auto-ingestion from Drive/Notion | Engine is closed-source; cloud-first (local binary lacks connectors and MCP); only inferred memories are reviewed | |
Purpose-built for Claude Code, Chroma vectors + SQLite FTS5, MCP server | Needs Bun, uv, Chroma and a worker service; LLM observer; no contradiction detection or write governance | |
Self-editing memory blocks, sleep-time agents, git-tracked memory (letta-code) | Full agent runtime (heavy), not just memory; hybrid search needs Turbopuffer | |
Temporal knowledge graph (Graphiti, Apache-2.0), bi-temporal model, BM25 + vector + RRF, MCP server | Needs a graph database and an LLM; Zep itself is the managed service | |
Native LangChain/LangGraph integration, background extraction | Tied to LangChain ecosystem; retrieval delegated to the LangGraph store | |
Graph + vector memory, local-first defaults, auto-improve loop, MCP server | LLM-driven graph build; heavy dependency tree; no lexical+vector fusion or write governance | |
Multimodal ingestion, semantic search, managed platform | Cloud-only, managed service | |
Full ML pipeline (cross-encoder + QMD + beam search), 33 MCP tools | Bun/TypeScript with local GGUF models (~4 GB); no propose/review/apply pipeline | |
Markdown wiki/skills, host-agent-driven capture, LLM-free vector retrieval | Needs an embedding API key; no lexical or hybrid search; no MCP server | |
Single Go binary, FTS5 search, agent-judged conflict/supersession relations, Git sync | Lexical-only recall; no vector search or propose/review/apply pipeline | |
Markdown knowledge graph, FTS + vector hybrid search, valid-time filters | Python with many dependencies; no contradiction detection or propose/review/apply pipeline | |
MIND-Mem | Integrity + governance + zero core deps + hybrid search + MIND kernels + 107 MCP tools (incl. MIC/MAP, walkthrough, persona, pipeline-hash) + cross-model consensus audits (published for v3.11 and v3.12; see | Lexical recall by default (vector/CE optional) |
Full Feature Matrix
Compared against every major memory solution for AI agents, checked against each project's public source or official docs in October 2026. Column codes and cell symbols are the same as in the Feature Completeness Matrix.
Recall
Feature | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
Vector | opt | ✓ | ✓ | Chroma | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | ↓1 |
Lexical | BM25F | BM25 | FTS | FTS5 | ◐ | BM25 | — | ◐ | Keyword | BM25 | — | FTS5 | FTS5 |
Graph | 2-hop | ◐ | ✓ | — | — | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ | ↓2 | — | — | ✓ |
Hybrid + RRF | opt | ◐3 | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | — | — | ◐4 |
Cross-encoder | ↓5 | opt | opt | — | ◐ | ✓ | — | — | ↓6 | ↓7 | — | — | opt |
Intent routing | 9 types | — | — | — | — | — | — | ◐ | — | ✓ | — | — | — |
Query expansion | ↓8 | — | ↓9 | — | — | — | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ↓10 | — | — | — |
1 Basic Memory, Vector: FastEmbed2 ClawMem, Graph: Beam + MPFP3 Mem0, Hybrid + RRF: no RRF4 Basic Memory, Hybrid + RRF: score fusion5 MIND-Mem, Cross-encoder: MiniLM 80MB6 Graphlit, Cross-encoder: Reranker7 ClawMem, Cross-encoder: qwen3 0.6B8 MIND-Mem, Query expansion: RM3 (zero-dep)9 Supermemory, Query expansion: LLM rewrite10 ClawMem, Query expansion: QMD 1.7B
Persistence
Feature | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
Structured | Markdown | JSON | Grph | SQL | Blk | Grph | KV | Grph | Grph | SQL | ↓1 | SQL | ↓2 |
Entities | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
Temporal | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ |
Supersede | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | — |
Append-only | ✓ | ◐ | — | — | — | ◐ | — | ◐ | — | — | — | ◐ | — |
A-MEM metadata | ✓ | — | — | ◐ | — | — | — | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ◐ | — |
1 MemU, Structured: SQL + Markdown2 Basic Memory, Structured: Markdown
Integrity
Feature | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
Contradictions | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | — | ◐ | — | ↓1 | — |
Drift detection | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ↓2 | ↓3 |
Validation | Structural | — | — | — | — | n/v | ◐ | ✓ | — | ◐ | — | ◐ | Schema |
Impact graph | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ◐ | — | — | — |
Coverage | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Multi-agent | ACL-based | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ |
Conflict res. | Automatic | ◐ | ◐ | — | — | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | — | ◐ | — | ↓4 | ◐ |
WAL/crash | ✓ | — | n/v | ◐ | — | n/v | — | ◐ | n/v | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ↓5 |
Backup/restore | ✓ | ◐ | — | ◐ | ◐ | — | — | — | — | — | — | JSON | Cloud |
Abstention | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ✓ | — | — | — |
1 Engram, Contradictions: Agent-judged2 Engram, Drift detection: Staleness3 Basic Memory, Drift detection: Schema drift4 Engram, Conflict res.: Agent-judged5 Basic Memory, WAL/crash: Index only
Governance
Feature | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
Auto-capture | Propose | Auto | Auto | Auto | Self | Ext | Auto | Auto | Ing | Auto | Auto | ↓1 | ↓2 |
Proposal queue | ✓ | — | ◐ | — | — | — | — | ◐ | — | — | — | — | — |
Rollback | ✓ | — | ◐ | — | ◐ | ◐ | — | — | — | ◐ | — | — | Cloud |
Mode governance | 3 modes | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Audit trail | Full | ◐ | ◐ | — | ◐ | ◐ | — | opt | n/v | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | — |
1 Engram, Auto-capture: Agent + passive2 Basic Memory, Auto-capture: Plugin hooks
Operations
Feature | MM | M0 | SM | CM | Le | Zep | LM | Co | GL | CW | MU | En | BM |
Local-only | ✓ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | — | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ |
Zero core deps | ✓ | — | n/v | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ✓ | — |
No daemon | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | — | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ | N/A | ◐ | ✓ | ◐ | ✓ |
GPU required | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No1 | No | No | No |
Git-friendly | ✓ | — | — | — | ✓ | — | — | — | — | ◐ | ◐ | ✓ | ✓ |
MCP server | 107 tools | Hosted | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | 23 tools | 27 tools |
MIND | 26 files | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1 ClawMem, GPU required: optional2 18 config + 8 source
The Gap MIND-Mem Fills
Most tools above focus on storage + retrieval. Where contradiction handling exists, it is LLM-driven at write time; none of them answers all of these:
"Do any of my decisions contradict each other?"
"Which decisions are active but nobody references anymore?"
"Did I make a decision in chat that was never formalized?"
"What's the downstream impact if I change this decision?"
"Is my memory state structurally valid right now?"
MIND-Mem focuses on memory governance and integrity — the critical layer most memory systems ignore entirely.
Why Plain Files Outperform Fancy Retrieval
Letta's August 2025 analysis showed that a plain-file baseline (full conversations stored as files + agent filesystem tools) scored 74.0% on LoCoMo with gpt-4o-mini — beating Mem0's top graph variant at 68.5%. Key reasons:
LLMs excel at tool-based retrieval. Agents can iteratively query/refine file searches better than single-shot vector retrieval that might miss subtle connections.
Benchmarks reward recall + reasoning over storage sophistication. Strong judge LLMs handle the rest once relevant chunks are loaded.
Overhead hurts. Specialized pipelines introduce failure modes (bad embeddings, chunking errors, stale indexes) that simple file access avoids.
For text-heavy agentic use cases, "how well the agent manages context" > "how smart the retrieval index is."
MIND-Mem's deterministic retrieval pipeline validates these findings: 73.8% on the full 10-conversation LoCoMo suite (Acc≥50, canonical run below) with zero dependencies, no embeddings, and no vector database — 5.3pp above Mem0's top graph variant (68.5%). (68.5% is the Mem0 graph-variant figure quoted in Letta's analysis; the tables above use Mem0's own LoCoMo-paper number, 66.9%. Both are third-party self-reported and were not re-run by MIND-Mem.) The key insight: treating retrieval as a reasoning pipeline (wide candidate pool → deterministic rerank → context packing) matches embedding+vector systems without any ML infrastructure. Unlike plain-file baselines, MIND-Mem adds integrity checking, governance, and agent-agnostic shared memory via MCP.
Companion Tools
External tools that solve an adjacent problem MIND-Mem deliberately does not solve. They are listed as complements, not competitors — MIND-Mem does not depend on any of them. License, scope, and substrate-of-record concerns make co-existence the right pattern: each one is a separate process you run alongside MIND-Mem, never a package dependency.
Tool | Solves | Relationship to MIND-Mem |
MindLLM (STARGA, commercial; available to customers, contact info@star.ga) | Deterministic, evidence-chained local inference behind OpenAI-compatible endpoints | Optional LLM backend — |
GitNexus (third-party) | Code knowledge-graph indexer — parses repo structure (call graphs, dependencies, clusters) and serves architectural-awareness tools to coding agents over MCP | Sibling MCP server, no integration code. Its license is PolyForm Noncommercial, incompatible with MIND-Mem's Apache-2.0 as a programmatic dependency — so co-installation, never a dependency. |
GitNexus answers a different question
Question | Tool |
"What does the code do at this point in time?" | GitNexus |
"What did we decide, and why, over time?" | MIND-Mem |
Code structure now versus governed decision history — orthogonal, and usefully so. Install both and each shows up in your MCP client's tool list answering its own question domain, with no wiring between them:
# GitNexus — follow its own README for install + MCP registration
git clone https://github.com/abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus
# MIND-Mem (Apache-2.0, this repo)
pip install "mind-mem[all]"
mm install-all # auto-wires MCP for Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, ...Full positioning, the MindLLM quick start, and the license reasoning:
docs/companion-tools.md.
Recall
Default: BM25 Hybrid
python3 -m mind_mem.recall --query "authentication" --workspace .
python3 -m mind_mem.recall --query "auth" --json --limit 5 --workspace .
python3 -m mind_mem.recall --query "deadline" --active-only --workspace .BM25F scoring (k1=1.2, b=0.75) with per-field weighting, bigram phrase matching, overlapping sentence chunking, and query-type-aware parameter tuning. Searches across all structured files.
BM25F field weighting: Terms in Statement fields score 3x higher than terms in Context (0.5x). This naturally prioritizes core content over auxiliary metadata.
RM3 query expansion: Pseudo-relevance feedback from top-k initial results. JM-smoothed language model extracts expansion terms, interpolated with the original query at configurable alpha. Falls back to static synonyms for adversarial queries.
Adversarial abstention: Deterministic pre-LLM confidence gate. Computes confidence from entity overlap, BM25 score, speaker coverage, evidence density, and negation asymmetry. Below threshold → forces abstention.
Stemming: "queries" matches "query", "deployed" matches "deployment". Simplified Porter stemmer with zero dependencies.
Hybrid Search (BM25 + Vector + RRF)
{
"recall": {
"backend": "hybrid",
"vector_enabled": true,
"rrf_k": 60,
"bm25_weight": 1.0,
"vector_weight": 1.0
}
}Thread-parallel BM25 and vector retrieval fused via RRF: score(doc) = bm25_w / (k + bm25_rank) + vec_w / (k + vec_rank). Deduplicates by block ID. Falls back to BM25-only when vector backend is unavailable.
Graph-Based (2-hop cross-reference boost)
python3 -m mind_mem.recall --query "database" --graph --workspace .2-hop graph traversal: 1-hop neighbors get 0.3x score boost, 2-hop get 0.1x (tagged [graph]). Surfaces structurally connected blocks via AlignsWith, Dependencies, Supersedes, Sources, and ConstraintSignature scopes. Auto-enabled for multi-hop queries.
Vector (pluggable)
{
"recall": {
"backend": "vector",
"vector_enabled": true,
"vector_model": "all-MiniLM-L6-v2",
"onnx_backend": true
}
}Supports ONNX inference (local, no server) or cloud embeddings. Falls back to BM25 automatically if unavailable.
MIND Kernels
MIND-Mem ships 26 .mind files under mind/: 18 INI-style pipeline
configuration files and eight MIND-language tensor sources. Configuration is
parsed by load_kernel_config() in src/mind_mem/mind_ffi.py; compiler sources
are migration prototypes. See the file inventory and
format distinction.
Native migration status
The Python implementation remains available without mindc. An optional C
library implements the existing native scoring ABI. A MIND-emitted replacement
still needs compiler support, consumer ABI compatibility, numerical parity and
performance validation. Source verification alone does not establish those gates.
See compiler development and native bridge status for the
current boundary. The 26 files ship in the wheel under
<sys.prefix>/share/mind-mem/kernels/; packaging them does not execute the sources.
Compiler Source Index
Source | Role |
| MIND-language scoring prototypes |
| MIND-language scoring prototypes |
The other 18 files are INI-style configurations and do not define compiler functions. See the source/configuration inventory.
Performance
Function | N=100 | N=1,000 | N=5,000 |
| 10.8x | 69.0x | 72.5x |
| 13.2x | 113.8x | 193.1x |
| 3.3x | 7.0x | 18.4x |
| 10.7x | 15.3x | 26.9x |
| 3.3x | 19.8x | 17.7x |
| 22.3x | 46.2x | 48.6x |
| 0.9x | 0.8x | 0.9x |
| 3.1x | 8.1x | 11.8x |
| 5.1x | 26.6x | 121.8x |
Overall | 49.0x |
Previously reported local figures, retained for reference: 49x aggregate speedup at N=5,000 and up to 193x for an individual function. The harness sums kernel medians and excludes native array marshaling; this is not an end-to-end retrieval measurement. These C ABI figures lack a current source/artifact/hardware receipt here and do not establish MIND emission or numerical parity. The earlier 14-layer runtime protection claim is also unverified by the current C source.
FFI Bridge
The compiled .so exposes a C99-compatible ABI. Python calls via ctypes through src/mind_mem/mind_ffi.py:
from mind_ffi import get_kernel, is_available, is_protected
if is_available():
kernel = get_kernel()
scores = kernel.rrf_fuse_py(bm25_ranks, vec_ranks, k=60.0)
print(f"Protected: {is_protected()}") # True with the hardened buildWithout MIND
If lib/libmindmem.so is not present, MIND-Mem uses the supported pure-Python
implementations. The optional native C library is a performance path; no
MIND-emitted replacement or cross-backend parity claim follows from its absence.
Auto-Capture
Session end
↓
capture.py scans daily log (or --scan-all for batch)
↓
Detects decision/task language (27 patterns, 3 confidence levels)
↓
Extracts structured metadata (subject, object, tags)
↓
Classifies confidence (high/medium/low → P1/P2/P3)
↓
Writes to intelligence/SIGNALS.md ONLY
↓
User reviews signals
↓
/apply promotes to DECISIONS.md or TASKS.mdBatch scanning: python3 -m mind_mem.capture . --scan-all scans the last 7 days of daily logs.
Safety guarantee: capture.py never writes to decisions/ or tasks/ directly. All signals must go through the apply engine.
Multi-Agent Memory
Namespace Setup
python3 -m mind_mem.namespaces workspace/ --init coder-1 reviewer-1Creates shared/ (visible to all) and agents/coder-1/, agents/reviewer-1/ (private) directories with ACL config.
Access Control
{
"default_policy": "read",
"agents": {
"coder-1": {"namespaces": ["shared", "agents/coder-1"], "write": ["agents/coder-1"], "read": ["shared"]},
"reviewer-*": {"namespaces": ["shared"], "write": [], "read": ["shared"]},
"*": {"namespaces": ["shared"], "write": [], "read": ["shared"]}
}
}Shared Fact Ledger
High-confidence facts proposed to shared/intelligence/LEDGER.md become visible to all agents after review. Append-only with dedup and file locking.
Conflict Resolution
python3 -m mind_mem.conflict_resolver workspace/ --analyze
python3 -m mind_mem.conflict_resolver workspace/ --proposeGraduated resolution: confidence priority > scope specificity > timestamp priority > manual fallback.
Transcript Capture
python3 -m mind_mem.transcript_capture workspace/ --transcript path/to/session.jsonl
python3 -m mind_mem.transcript_capture workspace/ --scan-recent --days 3Scans Claude Code JSONL transcripts for user corrections, convention discoveries, and architectural decisions. 16 patterns with confidence classification.
Backup & Restore
python3 -m mind_mem.backup_restore backup workspace/ --output backup.tar.gz
python3 -m mind_mem.backup_restore export workspace/ --output export.jsonl
python3 -m mind_mem.backup_restore restore workspace/ --input backup.tar.gz
python3 -m mind_mem.backup_restore wal-replay workspace/Governance Modes
Mode | What it does | When to use |
| Scan + validate + report only | Start here. First week after install. |
| Report + generate fix proposals in | After a clean observation week with zero critical issues. |
| Bounded auto-supersede + self-healing within constraints | Production mode. Requires explicit opt-in. |
Recommended rollout:
Install → run in
detect_onlyfor 7 daysReview scan logs → if clean, switch to
proposeTriage proposals for 2-3 weeks → if confident, enable
enforce
Block Format
All structured data uses a simple, parseable markdown format:
[D-20260213-001]
Date: 2026-02-13
Status: active
Statement: Use PostgreSQL for the user database
Tags: database, infrastructure
Rationale: Better JSON support than MySQL for our use case
ConstraintSignatures:
- id: CS-db-engine
domain: infrastructure
subject: database
predicate: engine
object: postgresql
modality: must
priority: 9
scope: {projects: [PRJ-myapp]}
evidence: Benchmarked JSON performance
axis:
key: database.engine
relation: standalone
enforcement: structuralBlocks are parsed by block_parser.py — a zero-dependency markdown parser that extracts [ID] headers and Key: Value fields into structured dicts.
Configuration
All settings in mind-mem.json (created by init_workspace.py):
{
"version": "5.0.4",
"auto_capture": true,
"auto_recall": true,
"governance_mode": "detect_only",
"recall": {
"backend": "bm25",
"rrf_k": 60,
"bm25_weight": 1.0,
"vector_weight": 1.0,
"vector_model": "all-MiniLM-L6-v2",
"vector_enabled": false,
"onnx_backend": false
},
"proposal_budget": {
"per_run": 3,
"per_day": 6,
"backlog_limit": 30
},
"compaction": {
"archive_days": 90,
"snapshot_days": 30,
"log_days": 180,
"signal_days": 60
}
}Key | Default | Description |
| installed package version | Config file version (written by |
|
| Run capture engine on session end ( |
|
| Show health/recall context on session start ( |
|
| Governance mode ( |
|
|
|
|
| RRF fusion parameter k |
|
| BM25 weight in RRF fusion |
|
| Vector weight in RRF fusion |
|
| Embedding model for vector search |
|
| Enable vector search backend |
|
| Use ONNX for local embeddings (no server needed) |
|
| Max proposals generated per scan |
|
| Max proposals per day |
|
| Max pending proposals before pausing |
|
| Archive completed blocks older than N days |
|
| Remove apply snapshots older than N days |
|
| Archive daily logs older than N days |
|
| Remove resolved/rejected signals older than N days |
MCP Server
MIND-Mem ships with a Model Context Protocol server that exposes memory as resources and tools to any MCP-compatible client.
Pair with mind-nerve for token-cheap routing. When your agent host loads many skills/tools/MCP servers, mind-nerve sits in front and returns only the top-K relevant to each request — typically a 95%+ reduction in skill-listing tokens. Apache-2.0 wheel,
pip install mind-nerve. Seestar-ga/mind-nerve.
Install
pipx install "mind-mem[mcp]" # preferred — isolated venv with mind-mem-mcp on PATH
# or
pip install --user "mind-mem[mcp]"The [mcp] extra pulls fastmcp>=3.2.0 (the version line declared in
pyproject.toml) and registers the mind-mem-mcp console script.
Automatic Setup (Recommended)
./install.sh --allConfigures all detected clients automatically. See Quick Start.
Manual Setup
For the JSON-configured MCP clients below (and Claude Desktop), add to the respective JSON config under mcpServers:
{
"mcpServers": {
"mind-mem": {
"command": "mind-mem-mcp",
"args": [],
"env": {"MIND_MEM_WORKSPACE": "/path/to/your/workspace"}
}
}
}mind-mem-mcp is the console script registered by pipx install "MIND-Mem[mcp]" (or pip install --user "MIND-Mem[mcp]"). If you're running
out of a source checkout instead, replace "command": "mind-mem-mcp" with
"command": "python3", "args": ["/path/to/mind-mem/mcp_server.py"].
Client | Config File |
Claude Code ( |
|
Codex CLI ( |
|
Grok Build CLI ( |
|
Vibe (Mistral CLI) ( |
|
OpenCode (1.x / 2.x) ( |
|
Gemini CLI ( |
|
Cursor ( |
|
Windsurf ( |
|
aider ( | no MCP writer — |
OpenClaw ( | no MCP writer — |
NanoClaw ( | no MCP writer — |
NemoClaw ( | no MCP writer — |
Continue ( |
|
Cline ( |
|
Roo Code ( |
|
Zed ( |
|
GitHub Copilot (workspace instructions) ( | no MCP writer — |
GitHub Copilot CLI ( |
|
Cody ( | no MCP writer — |
Qodo Gen ( | no MCP writer — |
Cline and Roo Code: the installer writes the VS Code Server (remote / WSL) settings tree,
~/.vscode-server/data/User/. Desktop VS Code keeps its user settings elsewhere (for example~/.config/Code/User/on Linux), and those paths are not written yet; add the MCP entry there by hand for now.
Claude Desktop is not in the mm install-all registry. Configure it with
./install.sh --claude-desktop or by hand in
~/.config/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json).
For Codex CLI (TOML format), add to ~/.codex/config.toml:
[mcp_servers.mind-mem]
command = "mind-mem-mcp"
args = []
[mcp_servers.mind-mem.env]
MIND_MEM_WORKSPACE = "/path/to/your/workspace"For Zed, add to ~/.config/zed/settings.json under context_servers:
{
"context_servers": {
"mind-mem": {
"command": {
"path": "mind-mem-mcp",
"args": [],
"env": {"MIND_MEM_WORKSPACE": "/path/to/your/workspace"}
}
}
}
}Direct (stdio / HTTP)
# stdio transport (default)
MIND_MEM_WORKSPACE=/path/to/workspace mind-mem-mcp
# HTTP transport (multi-client / remote) — requires MIND_MEM_TOKEN per v3.7.0 fail-closed contract
MIND_MEM_WORKSPACE=/path/to/workspace MIND_MEM_TOKEN=$(openssl rand -hex 32) \
mind-mem-mcp --transport http --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8765Resources (read-only)
URI | Description |
| Active decisions |
| All tasks |
| Entities (projects, people, tools, incidents) |
| Signals that PASSED review + |
| Detected contradictions |
| Workspace health summary |
| BM25 recall search results |
| Shared fact ledger (multi-agent) |
Core tools (23 of 107; full list in docs/api-reference.md)
Tool | Description |
| Search memory with BM25 (query, limit, active_only) |
| Propose a decision/task — writes to SIGNALS.md only |
| Apply a staged proposal (dry_run=True by default) |
| Rollback an applied proposal by receipt timestamp |
| Run integrity scan (contradictions, drift, signals) |
| List contradictions with auto-resolution analysis |
| Hybrid BM25+Vector search with RRF fusion |
| Find blocks similar to a given block |
| Classify query intent (9 types with parameter recommendations) |
| Index statistics, MIND kernel availability, block counts |
| Pipeline rejection rates, intent histogram, hard negatives |
| Rebuild FTS5 index (optionally including vectors) |
| View/trigger A-MEM metadata evolution for a block |
| List available MIND kernel configurations |
| Read a specific MIND kernel configuration as JSON |
| Category summaries relevant to a given topic |
| Pre-assemble context from recent conversation signals |
| Delete a memory block by ID (admin-scope) |
| Export workspace as JSONL (user-scope) |
| Submit quality feedback for a retrieved block (thumbs up/down) |
| View per-block and global calibration statistics |
| Report whether acting on recalled blocks actually worked |
| Query recorded outcomes — which memories earned their keep |
Token Auth (HTTP)
MIND_MEM_TOKEN=your-secret mind-mem-mcp --transport http --port 8765As of v3.7.0, HTTP authentication fails CLOSED. If neither
MIND_MEM_TOKEN nor MIND_MEM_ADMIN_TOKEN is set, the server refuses
to start. For local development you can opt back into the legacy
behaviour, but only on a loopback bind:
MIND_MEM_ALLOW_UNAUTHENTICATED_LOCALHOST=1 \
mind-mem-mcp --transport http --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8765 \
--allow-unauthenticated-localhostThe flag is a no-op if the bind host isn't 127.0.0.1 / ::1 /
localhost — the server still refuses to start. Production
deployments should always set a token.
The standalone mm http-serve adapter also enforces route privileges when
MIND_MEM_ADMIN_TOKEN is configured. Send either credential through
X-MindMem-Token: the user token can access user routes, while the admin
token also authenticates and may access admin routes. A user request to an
admin route receives HTTP 404. Setting the admin variable to an empty or
comma-only value keeps admin routes closed; leaving it unset preserves
legacy single-token full access. Authentication and route authorization
share one credential snapshot per request, refreshed for each request on
a persistent connection, so a token rotation takes effect on the next request.
Safety Guarantees
propose_updatenever writes to DECISIONS.md or TASKS.md. All proposals go to SIGNALS.md.approve_applydefaults to dry_run=True. Creates a snapshot before applying for rollback.All resources are read-only. No MCP client can mutate source of truth through resources.
Namespace-aware. Multi-agent workspaces scope resources by agent ACL.
Security
Threat Model
What we protect | How |
Memory integrity | Structural validator, ConstraintSignature validation |
Accidental overwrites | Proposal-based mutations only (never direct writes) |
Rollback safety | Snapshot before every apply, atomic |
Symlink attacks | Symlink detection in restore paths |
Path traversal | All paths resolved via |
What we do NOT protect against | Why |
Malicious local user | Single-user CLI tool — filesystem access = data access |
Network attacks | No network calls, no listening ports, no telemetry |
Encrypted storage | Files are plaintext Markdown — use disk encryption if needed |
No Network Calls
MIND-Mem makes zero network calls from its core. No telemetry, no phoning home, no cloud dependencies. Optional features (vector embeddings, cross-encoder) may download models on first use.
Requirements
Python 3.10+
No external packages — stdlib only for core functionality
Optional Dependencies
Package | Purpose | Install |
| MCP server |
|
| Local vector embeddings |
|
| Cross-encoder reranking |
|
| LLM extraction (local) |
|
mind-mem:4b — Purpose-Trained LLM
⏳ Coming: a retrained
mind-mem-4b. The weights published today are a full fine-tune of Qwen3.5-4B, trained against an earlier state of this repo. A full retrain on a newer base model is planned, generated from the current tool surface — several upcoming MIND-Mem features depend on it, because the shipped weights predate the surfaces those features expose. Until it lands, the current model remains the recommended one and everything below applies to it. The throughput figures in this section were measured on the current weights and will be restated when the new model ships. Not released yet; no date promised.
For best LLM extraction quality, use mind-mem:4b — a full fine-tune of Qwen3.5-4B on MIND-Mem's 8 extraction tasks (entity extraction, fact extraction, observation compression, contradiction detection, governance analysis, intent classification, axis-aware retrieval, LLM reranking). Empirical on RTX 3080 (Q4_K_M, 2.6GB VRAM): 104 tok/s generation, 1585 tok/s prefill (single-workstation Ollama measurement; no committed artifact).
Ollama (recommended):
# Download the GGUF from HuggingFace
wget https://huggingface.co/star-ga/mind-mem-4b/resolve/main/mind-mem-4b-Q4_K_M.gguf
# Create Ollama model
cat > Modelfile << 'EOF'
FROM ./mind-mem-4b-Q4_K_M.gguf
SYSTEM "You are mind-mem, a governance-aware memory extraction assistant."
PARAMETER temperature 0.1
PARAMETER num_ctx 8192
PARAMETER num_predict 1024
PARAMETER stop "<|im_end|>"
PARAMETER stop "<|endoftext|>"
EOF
ollama create mind-mem:4b -f ModelfileThen set in mind-mem.json:
{
"extraction": {
"enabled": true,
"model": "mind-mem:4b",
"backend": "ollama"
}
}Full fine-tune (transformers, no adapter):
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("star-ga/mind-mem-4b", device_map="auto", torch_dtype="bfloat16")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("star-ga/mind-mem-4b")Resource | Link |
Model (GGUF + bf16 safetensors) | |
Base model | Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B |
Training | Full fine-tune on Runpod H200 SXM (141 GB HBM3e), v4.0.0 corpus plus r3/r4 addendums (r4 includes 8 KernelKind anchor examples), bf16, paged-AdamW-8bit, batch 2 × accum 16, max_length 2048, LR 1.5e-5 cosine + 3% warmup |
Eval (current published v4.1.1 weights) | 133/133 = 100% — 111 main probes plus 22 held-out paraphrases, as reported in the HF model card. |
Two held-out probes use documented inference-time anchors. This is the published checkpoint's reported result, not a new independent evaluation or coverage of the full runtime surface. The weights were trained on 83 MCP tools. The current server exposes 107 MCP tools.
Platform Support
Platform | Status | Notes |
Linux | Full | Primary target |
macOS | Full | POSIX-compliant shell scripts |
Windows (WSL/Git Bash) | Full | Use WSL2 or Git Bash for shell hooks |
Windows (native) | Python only | Use |
Troubleshooting
Problem | Solution |
| Run in a workspace, not the repo root. Run |
| Workspace is empty. Add decisions/tasks first. |
| No |
| Good — no conflicting decisions. |
Tests fail on Windows | Use |
MIND kernel not loading | Expected — no compiled kernel ships in the wheel. Of the 26 |
FAQ
No results from recall?
Check that the workspace path is correct and points to an initialized workspace
containing decisions, tasks, or entities. If the FTS5 index is stale or missing,
run the reindex MCP tool to rebuild it.
MCP connection failed?
Verify that fastmcp is installed (pip install fastmcp). Check the transport
configuration in your client's MCP config (stdio vs HTTP). Ensure the
MIND_MEM_WORKSPACE environment variable points to a valid workspace directory.
MIND sources or native kernels not loading?
The eight MIND-language files are migration prototypes and are not required by
the supported Python path. The optional native backend is the C implementation
in lib/kernels.c; it is not bundled in the wheel. See
mind/README.md for the current source and ABI boundary.
Index corrupt?
Run the reindex MCP tool, or from the command line:
python3 -m mind_mem.sqlite_index --rebuild --workspace /path/to/workspace.
This drops and recreates the FTS5 index from all workspace files.
Specification
For the formal grammar, invariant rules, state machine, and atomicity guarantees, see SPEC.md.
MIND language sources
Eight files in mind/ contain MIND-language scoring prototypes; 18 additional
.mind files are INI-style runtime configuration. The prototypes have not
established a complete native backend, consumer ABI compatibility, numerical
parity, or performance parity. The existing optional native implementation is
the C library in lib/kernels.c, while the supported Python implementation
remains available without a compiler or shared library.
The MIND language compiler is at github.com/star-ga/mind. The formal specification is at github.com/star-ga/mind-spec. The agent CLI being built on the same substrate is at github.com/star-ga/mind (RFC 0013, in development). Visit mindlang.dev to see the substrate that makes byte-identical replay possible.
The compiler and specification links above are the references for MIND-language syntax and semantics. A readable source prototype or compiler verification does not by itself establish native execution or byte-identical scoring output.
Contributing
Contributions welcome. Please open an issue first to discuss what you'd like to change.
See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines.
License
Apache 2.0 — Copyright 2026 STARGA Inc and contributors.
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Persistent memory for AI agents across Claude, ChatGPT and any MCP client.
- memnodeOAuthdev.memnode
Persistent, inspectable memory for AI agents with lineage, correction, and a hosted MCP endpoint.
Persistent AI memory shared across Claude, ChatGPT, coding agents, and compatible MCP clients.
Persistent memory for AI agents. EU-hosted, privacy-first, hybrid recall, contradiction detection.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hosted memory and governance layer for AI coding agents. 28 MCP tools with hybrid search, structured knowledge capture, behavioral nudges, and git-native storage. Zero cloud dependencies.306Business Source 1.1
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePersistent memory for AI coding agents that stores and recalls preferences, decisions, and conventions via semantic similarity, with zero cloud dependencies and plug-and-play MCP integration for Claude Code.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP-native persistent memory layer for AI agents across Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, and OpenClaw. Powered by hybrid vector search, BM25, and cross-encoder reranking with a published 73.1% LoCoMo benchmark accuracy.4Apache 2.0

Memcellofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceLiving memory for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex). Cross-vendor persistent memory, decision recall, and outcome calibration via MCP and hooks.1,351 npmApache 2.0