Korean Law MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Korean Law MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and retrieve Korean laws, regulations, administrative rules, legal interpretations, and precedents via official APIs for legal review workflows.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and analyze Korean law, including statutes, precedents, and ordinances, with citation verification and impact analysis.1011,768 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and terminal users to search Korean statutes, court precedents, administrative rules, local ordinances, treaties, and legal interpretations through 10 tools backed by 42 Ministry of Government Legislation APIs. It also supports verifying citations in AI-generated answers against the official legal sources.1011,768 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI systems to search, retrieve, and analyze Korean legal information from the National Law Information API (law.go.kr), including laws, administrative rules, English translations, and law-ordinance linkages.262-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables real-time search and analysis of Korean laws, legal precedents, and administrative rules through the National Law Information Center Open API, allowing AI agents to access official legal information for contract review, compliance, and legal research.75-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceKorean tax law for AI agents: search NTS rulings, court and Tax Tribunal decisions; read point-in-time statutes with the Act → Decree → Rule chain and amendment history; basic rules and execution standards; 96 tax treaties with withholding rates; forms and schedules; and verify citations in drafts. Fact-pattern comparison is done by your AI (or optional on-prem/cloud Upstage Solar).14258MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Core search/retrieval pairs are well separated (search_law vs get_law_text, search_decisions vs get_decision_text), and the discover/execute meta pair is distinct. However legal_research and legal_analysis are broad multi-mode hubs whose modes overlap with ordinance_radar, get_law_text, and search_decisions; the detailed descriptions help, but boundaries remain fuzzy.
All tools use snake_case, and most follow a recognizable verb_noun pattern such as search_law, get_law_text, search_decisions, and execute_tool. The noun/adjective-based names (ordinance_radar, legal_research, legal_analysis) are minor deviations rather than a different convention.
Ten top-level tools is well within the appropriate range, and the discover_tools/execute_tool meta pair sensibly avoids exposing 80+ specialist tools directly. Each top-level tool has a meaningful role in the surface.
The set covers the full read-only legal research lifecycle: law lookup, statute text and annex retrieval, ordinance maintenance analysis, decision search/retrieval, multi-step research, citation verification, and amendment comparison. Meta access to specialist domains fills the remaining gaps.