Skip to main content
Glama
proptech-inquiry

proptech-inquiry

by srnux

Related Servers

Alternatives to proptech-inquiry

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and inspect a real-estate catalog, record client inquiries, and check data-feed health, with per-identity tool permissions, hashed bearer tokens, rate limiting, and PII-free audit logging. The feed is validated item-by-item so broken records are dropped and reported before they reach the model.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to manage real-estate listing properties and photos from MCP-capable assistants, including listing and searching properties, starting photo enhancements, checking credit balances, and obtaining browser upload links.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Unified UK property search across major portals with deduplication and open-data enrichment, enabling natural-language queries for listings, sold prices, EPC, crime, schools, and market stats.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to discover public county property-record catalogs, ask guided search questions, preview recorded facts, save searches, and review single-package or monthly lead offers before checkout. Public catalog discovery and record previews work without an account or API key.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to look up real estate agents, search MLS listings, submit buyer/seller leads, and access proprietary seller-intent signals in SC and GA.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: search by criteria, retrieve one record, or escalate to a human. The descriptions explicitly define boundaries (search_listings says do not use it for a specific listing; get_listing says answer only from the record), so misselection is unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three names follow a clear verb_noun pattern (search_listings, get_listing, hand_off_to_human) with consistent snake_case.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is lean for the narrow inquiry-handling scope, and each earns its place, though it sits near the lower bound where coverage could feel thin for edge cases.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-plus-escalate lifecycle is well covered: criteria search, full record retrieval, and human handoff for bookings, negotiation, legal, and unanswerable questions. Only listing management/creation is absent, which is outside an inquiry agent's stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues