Skip to main content
Glama

authorize_nanoleaf

Authorize connection to Nanoleaf smart lights by establishing secure pairing with devices currently in pairing mode.

Instructions

Authorize connection to Nanoleaf device (device must be in pairing mode)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • Handler for the 'authorize_nanoleaf' tool. Checks if primaryDevice exists, calls authorize() on it, and returns appropriate success or error response.
    case 'authorize_nanoleaf':
      if (!primaryDevice) {
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: 'No device connected. Please run connect_to_ip or discover_nanoleaf first.',
            },
          ],
        };
      }
      try {
        const authToken = await primaryDevice.authorize();
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: `Successfully authorized! Auth token: ${authToken.substring(0, 8)}... (truncated for security)`,
            },
          ],
        };
      } catch (error) {
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: `Authorization failed: ${error}`,
            },
          ],
        };
      }
  • Input schema definition for the 'authorize_nanoleaf' tool, registered in the ListTools response. No input parameters required.
    {
      name: 'authorize_nanoleaf',
      description: 'Authorize connection to Nanoleaf device (device must be in pairing mode)',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {},
      },
    },
  • Implementation of the authorize method in NanoleafClient class. Sends POST request to /new endpoint to obtain authentication token and stores it.
    async authorize(): Promise<string> {
      try {
        const response = await this.httpClient.post('/new');
        const authToken = response.data.auth_token;
        this.device.authToken = authToken;
        return authToken;
      } catch (error) {
        throw new Error('Failed to authorize. Make sure to hold the power button on your Nanoleaf device for 5-7 seconds.');
      }
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions the pairing requirement, which is useful context, but doesn't disclose other behavioral traits such as whether this is a one-time setup, if it requires specific permissions, what happens on failure, or if it returns credentials. For an authorization tool with zero annotation coverage, this is inadequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste. It front-loads the core purpose and includes essential context (pairing mode) without unnecessary details, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (authorization with no parameters) and lack of annotations/output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It covers the pairing requirement but misses details like return values, error handling, or dependencies on other tools (e.g., 'discover_nanoleaf'). For a setup tool, this leaves gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description adds value by specifying the pairing mode requirement, which compensates for the lack of parameters. Baseline 4 is appropriate for zero-parameter tools when the description provides context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Authorize connection') and target resource ('Nanoleaf device'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'connect_to_ip' or 'discover_nanoleaf'. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from all siblings (e.g., 'connect_to_ip' might also involve authorization).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use this tool ('device must be in pairing mode'), which implicitly distinguishes it from tools like 'get_effects' or 'set_brightness'. It doesn't explicitly state when not to use it or name alternatives, but the pairing requirement offers practical guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/srnetadmin/nanoleaf-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server