Skip to main content
Glama
srinivassrinu842

AAP MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to AAP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Industry-standard MCP server for AWX/AAP/Ansible Tower automation, enabling AI agents to manage job templates, launch and monitor jobs, and handle inventories and projects through natural language.
      12
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables natural language interaction with an Ansible repository, providing tools for inventory inspection, syntax checking, and playbook execution with configurable safety controls.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server suite for Red Hat's automation ecosystem, enabling AI assistants to interact with Ansible Automation Platform, Event-Driven Ansible, ansible-lint, and official Red Hat documentation with secure domain validation.
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes Ansible modules to AI agents with a search-schema-check-execute workflow, enabling safe ad-hoc runs via check mode by default. It provides tools to search modules, fetch schemas, run modules, and list collections.
      5
      3
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 86 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear resource-action boundaries with consistent verb_noun naming, making them easy to tell apart. Minor overlaps exist between get_recent_activity and get_audit_logs (explicit alias) and among health/cluster/instance status tools, but these are not confusing enough to cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent aap_ verb_noun snake_case convention, with actions like list, get, create, update, delete applied uniformly across resources. Exceptions like add_user_to_team and get_job_output still fit within the established pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    86 tools is far beyond the threshold where a toolset is considered well-scoped, making the surface feel heavy and harder to navigate. While AAP is a large platform, the sheer number of tools could overwhelm an agent and increase selection complexity.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers many core workflows including project, inventory, job template, and workflow management. However, notable gaps exist: no get operations for inventories, hosts, groups, teams, schedules, or execution environments, and no list_groups or general job history listing. These are significant omissions for resources that otherwise have create/update/delete coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues