update_channel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-destructive, non-read-only behavior. The description adds no further context on side effects (e.g., whether category order replaces entirely, or any auth/rate-limit considerations). The update nature is implied but not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loaded with the main purpose, and uses a clear format for parameter definitions without unnecessary verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description covers the core functionality, it lacks explanation for required parameters (channel_id, hub_profile_id) and does not mention return values or error conditions, leaving some gaps for a complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description explains workspace_id, privacy, and categories, but omits channel_id and hub_profile_id, both of which are required. It also does not clarify that name is required even when updating only other fields, leaving gaps in the parameter coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates a channel's name, privacy, and category order, with a specific verb and resource, and is readily distinguishable from sibling tools like create_channel or archive_channel.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides some parameter guidance (e.g., workspace_id from list_workspaces, privacy values, categories format) but does not explicitly state conditions for when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor clarify that name is required even when updating only other fields.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.