Devtrack MCP Server
This server provides read-only, SQLite-backed MCP tools for accessing a developer's DevTrack context, including active ticket, commits, pending actions, voice profile, and end-of-day summaries.
Get active work context — Retrieve the current active ticket, repo path, today's commit count, and ticket-mapping confidence.
Get today's commits — List today's commits grouped by ticket ID, with optional repository-path filtering.
Get pending actions — Review the queue of actions DevTrack wants to take, including confidence scores and expiry times.
Get ticket context — Fetch full context for a specific ticket: recent commits, related pending actions, and last activity time.
Get voice profile — View the developer's inferred writing style for different contexts (commit, comment, report, task, ticket mapping).
Get end-of-day summary — Retrieve a template-based EOD narrative draft summarizing the day's commits by ticket.
Comment on issues/PRs, sync recent activity, and alert on review requests.
Comment on issues; list, view, create, and sync issues through the Go connector.
Supports posting commit comments and transitioning tickets, with server-side webhook integration for PM workflows.
DevTrack
Never write a standup again.
You commit. Tickets update, EOD reports write themselves — silently, in your voice, entirely on your machine.
devtrack — a single Go binary. Local-first. Offline by default.

The 30-second pitch
You write code. DevTrack handles the rest.
A background daemon watches your commits and infers everything around them — which ticket you're on (from the branch name), what you did today, what the standup should say. It drafts the ticket comment and the EOD report in your writing voice, learned from your own git history. Your only obligation: name branches with ticket IDs.
Nothing is sent behind your back. Every outbound action — a Jira comment, a ticket transition, an email — is staged in a review queue first. You approve it, or you let it earn auto-approve over time. The daemon never prompts you, never blocks a commit, and never interrupts.
And it's the memory your AI agents lack
Available since v3.1.0: Phase 9 onboarding and the local, read-only MCP server ship in the latest public release, v3.1.1. Five native MCPB bundles are available for Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Coding agents are session-based: they exist while invoked, then forget. DevTrack is always on. One command —
devtrack mcp setup— and Claude Code knows your active ticket, today's commits, your pending queue, and how you write. Nothing else runs at 6pm, groups the day's commits by ticket, and has the EOD ready before you ask.
Trust
Local Ollama by default; SQLite on disk. The default daily path stays on your machine. If you
configure a PM system, email/chat delivery, an external server, or a cloud LLM, DevTrack sends only
the payload needed for that enabled operation. Anonymous usage telemetry is opt-in and off unless
you run devtrack telemetry on.
Related MCP server: devbase
Ten-minute quickstart
The latest public release is v3.1.1. Download the matching platform asset from GitHub Releases, or build from source:
git clone --branch main --single-branch https://github.com/sraj0501/Devtrack_.git
cd Devtrack_/devtrack_client
go build -o devtrack .
sudo install -m 0755 devtrack /usr/local/bin/devtrackVerify that this is an MCP-capable build, then run setup from the Git repository you want DevTrack
to watch. Choose none when asked for a PM integration if you only want to try the local path.
Managed mode requires a PostgreSQL URL for the Python service; Ollama remains the default LLM and
can finish preparing in the background.
devtrack mcp status # must report six registered tools
cd /path/to/the/repo/to/watch
devtrack setupMinute 2: local context, no Python or model required
The Go binary and local SQLite database are ready as soon as setup finishes. Wire the current repository into Claude Code, then exercise the same MCP server locally:
devtrack mcp setup
devtrack mcp testReload Claude Code after mcp setup. Its DevTrack tools can now read the active ticket, today's
commits, pending actions, voice profile, ticket context, and a template EOD summary. The MCP server
runs on demand over stdio; it does not need a background Python process.
Minutes 3–10: start the silent worker
devtrack start
devtrack status
devtrack doctorstatus and doctor report background Python, PostgreSQL, and LLM readiness without blocking Git
monitoring or MCP. Once the AI server reports ready, create a normal ticket-named branch and commit:
git switch -c feature/AUTH-42-refresh-token
git commit -m "fix auth redirect"
devtrack logs # confirm the commit and ticket were detected
devtrack queue # review local pending actions and confidence
devtrack eod # generate a narrative; stages it before any deliveryDo not run queue approve while evaluating the no-send path. With the workspace PM integration set
to none and no --email argument, the walkthrough uses no PM credentials and has no external
destination. For a disposable, recorder-friendly version that verifies actual log output instead of
using a canned transcript, see the demo storyboard.
./scripts/demo.sh --check # Linux/macOS preflight
./scripts/demo.sh --record # Linux/macOS end-to-end run.\scripts\demo.ps1 -Mode Check # Windows preflight
.\scripts\demo.ps1 -Mode Record # Windows end-to-end runFor the automated, isolated no-send client lane on native Windows plus WSL Linux:
.\scripts\e2e-local.ps1For Windows browser acceptance of real server-backed action review, rejection, audit, and EOD visibility, see Windows admin acceptance. It uses an existing Managed environment and keeps screenshots/traces private.
If local PowerShell policy blocks repository scripts, use a process-scoped invocation without changing the machine policy:
powershell.exe -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File .\scripts\e2e-local.ps1The launcher uses WSL when Go is installed there and otherwise falls back to a disposable Linux Go container through Docker Desktop; it does not alter the WSL distribution.
The included CI workflow runs the same temporary-workspace test on native Windows and Ubuntu. The
test verifies the real commit-to-daemon-to-SQLite-to-MCP path without credentials or outbound
delivery; both hosted lanes have passed on dev. The Managed PostgreSQL/Python/LLM path is
qualified separately from those hosted lanes.
On an already configured Managed installation, add -Automated on Windows or --automated on
Linux/macOS to run the full demo without recording pauses.
What is ready when?
Capability | Available before AI readiness | Needs the managed/external Python service |
Git monitoring, ticket extraction, local SQLite | Yes | No |
MCP setup, self-test, and local context tools | Yes | No |
Queue inspection and correction for local actions | Yes | No |
Voice-aware ticket-comment generation | No | Yes |
| No | Yes |
The Python service and model preparation are background work. If they are not ready by minute ten,
keep coding and check devtrack doctor; the Go-native path remains usable and commits are not
blocked.
Current validation status: The remaining release follow-ups are packaged-build acceptance, privacy-reviewed media capture, and confirmation of the exact Glama listing path and score badge. See the end-to-end validation record for current evidence and exit criteria.
Current product focus: DevTrack Sage
Planning has begun for DevTrack Sage, a broader local knowledge and session-memory layer that is
not restricted to Git workflows. This is a planning direction, not a claim that the broader
capability is implemented. The currently shipped devtrack sage ask and devtrack sage do
commands remain Git-focused. See the
implementation plan.
Update an existing installation
devtrack upgradedevtrack upgrade installs the latest public release, including the Phase 9 onboarding and MCP
commands introduced in v3.1.0.
The daemon mines enabled local repositories in Managed mode and builds the voice profile once the
local AI server is reachable. devtrack status and devtrack doctor show the persistent result and
suggest devtrack work report when the profile is ready.
Setup also checks Ollama's local model inventory. An existing generation model is used immediately without another pull. If no usable local model is ready and an OpenAI or Anthropic key is already in the environment, setup offers that key as a temporary fallback while Ollama downloads; Ollama stays primary and automatically takes over when the local model becomes available.
Updating? Run
devtrack upgradeto download and install the latest binary automatically (fetched from GitHub Releases; supports Linux/macOS and Windows). If the binary is in a root-owned location (e.g./usr/local/bin), runsudo devtrack upgradeinstead. On Windows, re-run as Administrator if a permission error occurs. Versioned migrations are applied automatically and the daemon is restarted after a successful upgrade.
devtrack setupwrites a complete environment file under the DevTrack XDG data directory and registers it in~/.devtrack/devtrack.conf. Visible runtime defaults are editable; valid shell, CI, and secret-manager overrides still take precedence.
Full walkthrough and guides: devtrack.cloud
Moving to a new machine?
Project memory and agent logs are committed to the repo (.claude/memory/, Data/agent_logs/). After cloning, wire up Claude Code's memory system with one command:
# Replace <path-key> with the absolute repo path, slashes replaced by hyphens
# e.g. repo at /home/sraj/devtrack → -home-sraj-devtrack
mkdir -p ~/.claude/projects/<path-key>/
ln -s $(pwd)/.claude/memory ~/.claude/projects/<path-key>/memoryClaude Code will then read and write memory directly to the repo, keeping it in sync with git.
The core loop
The daemon is silent. It does not prompt, block, or interrupt — it observes and stages.
You: git checkout -b feat/AUTH-42-refresh-token
You: git commit -m "fix auth redirect"
│
▼
DevTrack observes (background — you are not interrupted)
│
├── infers ticket AUTH-42 from the branch name
├── drafts a ticket comment in your voice
└── STAGES it — nothing is sent yet
│
▼
devtrack queue # review what's waiting
devtrack queue approve <id>
│
At 6pm: today's commits, grouped by ticket
▼
devtrack eod # the standup, already writtenReview the queue whenever you like — it waits for you:
devtrack queue # what DevTrack wants to send
devtrack queue approve <id> # send it
devtrack queue reject <id> # discard it
devtrack eod # preview today's EOD reportOptional: AI-enhanced commits
Separately, devtrack git commit is an interactive wrapper that refines your commit message with AI, offers a ticket picker, and can log time. It is opt-in and never part of the silent daemon path:
eval "$(devtrack shell-init)" # add to ~/.zshrc or ~/.bashrc — done once
devtrack enable-git # opt this repo inAfter that, git commit routes through DevTrack for monitored repos. Everything else (git push, git pull, git status) goes straight to real git, unmodified. Escape hatch: GIT_NO_DEVTRACK=1 git commit -m "skip".
AI commit enhancement is only active when the daemon is running. If you stop it,
git commitpasses through with zero delay and no errors.
What it connects to
Integration | What DevTrack does |
Azure DevOps | Post commit comments, transition work item states, create missing items; PR approval detection via ADO Pull Requests API (real |
GitHub | Comment on issues/PRs, sync recent activity, alert on review requests |
GitLab | Comment on issues; list, view, create, and sync issues through the Go connector |
Jira | Server-side webhook and PM support; Go-client connector parity is part of the staged rollout |
Microsoft Teams | Learn your communication style for personalized AI output |
Outlook / MS Graph | Send EOD reports by email |
Telegram | Go-native daemon control, logs, queue review/corrections, and notifications |
Slack | Outbound alert notifications through an incoming webhook |
Ollama / OpenAI / Anthropic / Groq | AI commit messages, reports, conflict resolution, git-sage agent |
Key features
The pending-actions queue — nothing is sent without review
Every outbound action DevTrack wants to take is staged first, never fired blind. This is the trust primitive: one reviewable queue for everything that would otherwise write to your Jira, GitHub, or inbox.
devtrack queue # list pending actions (default)
devtrack queue --all # include recently posted/rejected
devtrack queue status # one-line summary: pending / posted today / rejected today
devtrack queue approve <id> # send it now
devtrack queue reject <id> # discard — will not post
devtrack queue edit <id> <json> # fix the payload before it goesEach action carries a confidence score. As you approve a given action type repeatedly, it can earn auto-approve — so DevTrack gets quieter the more you trust it, not louder.
End-of-day report — the standup, already written
devtrack eod # generate today's report
devtrack eod show # print the most recent narrative
devtrack eod status # is one staged?Groups the day's commits by ticket and writes the narrative in your voice. It is staged in the queue like anything else — review it, then send.
An explicit devtrack eod run sends only that day's minimal commit summaries from the local SQLite
client to the configured Python service. Continuous client-event synchronization remains disabled by
default; invoking EOD does not enable it.
Multi-repo monitoring
# workspaces.yaml
workspaces:
- name: work-api
path: ~/work/api
pm_platform: azure
pm_assignee: jane@example.com
pm_iteration_path: "MyProject\\Sprint 5"
pm_area_path: "MyProject\\Backend"
- name: oss-lib
path: ~/oss/my-lib
pm_platform: github
pm_milestone: 3
# Dual-platform: same repo tracked in GitHub (code) + Azure DevOps (PM)
- name: my-api-github
path: ~/work/my-api
pm_platform: github
pm_org: acme-corp
pm_username: sraj0501
skip_issues: true # code-only: excluded from devtrack issues + ticket sync
- name: my-api-ado
path: ~/work/my-api
pm_platform: azure
pm_org: acme-corp
pm_username: jane@acme.comPer-workspace PM overrides (pm_assignee, pm_iteration_path, pm_area_path, pm_milestone) are applied when DevTrack creates work items or issues for that repo — Azure uses assigned_to/area_path/iteration_path, GitHub/GitLab use assignees and milestone. Omit any field to use the global default.
skip_issues: true marks a workspace as code-only — it is excluded from devtrack issues, ticket sync, and the commit-time ticket picker. Use this when the same repo is tracked in two PM platforms (e.g. GitHub for code review, Azure DevOps for sprint planning) to prevent duplicate ticket lists.
devtrack workspace list
devtrack workspace add my-project ~/code/project --pm github
devtrack workspace install-hooks # push post-commit hooks to all enabled workspacesEmpty repositories: If a monitored workspace has no commits yet, the daemon watches the folder silently and begins triggering normally once the first commit arrives — no log spam or errors during the empty-repo period.
Work session tracking
devtrack work start AUTH-42 # start timing a ticket
devtrack work stop # auto-measures duration
devtrack work report # EOD narrative in terminal
devtrack work report --email me@org.comEvery git commit while a session is active automatically attaches its hash — no manual logging.
Sage commands — current Git-focused agent

devtrack sage do "squash my last 5 commits"
devtrack sage ask "how do I rebase onto main?"Runs an agentic loop: plans operations, executes them, reads output, handles failures with rollback, only asks when genuinely ambiguous. Session approval dialog (auto / review / suggest-only), step history, and interactive undo built in.
Personalized AI ("Talk Like You")
devtrack enable-learning # opt in
devtrack learning-sync # mine your git history
devtrack show-profile # view your inferred writing style
devtrack test-response "Completed auth module"Learns your writing voice from your own git history — local, automatic, no external service. It combines a style profile with ChromaDB RAG (real examples of how you write) to personalize every commit message, ticket comment, and report the system generates.
On a fresh Managed installation, the daemon automatically seeds Tier 0 voice data from enabled local Git
workspaces and generates the first profile in the background. Completion is saved locally in
first-run-profile.json; no PM action is sent and daemon startup never waits for the profile.
Microsoft Teams is an optional extra signal (TEAMS_ENABLED), not a requirement — the local git-history path is the default and works entirely offline.
Ticket alerter
devtrack alerts # unread notifications (last 24 h)
devtrack alerts --all
devtrack alerts --clearThe Go-native background poller watches GitHub and Azure DevOps for assigned work, comments, review requests, and status changes. It can deliver terminal, OS, Telegram, and Slack-webhook notifications.
GitHub: Issue/PR assigned, review requested, comment on involved issue
Azure DevOps: Work item assigned, comment added, state changed The poller is Go-native and runs inside the daemon — no Python subprocess, no MongoDB. Alert state (
last_checkedper source) and notifications persist to SQLite, so poll continuity survives daemon restarts.
Telegram bot — remote control from your phone
Control the daemon and supervise queued work without opening a terminal:
/status | /logs | /health | /trigger
/pause | /resume | /stop | /restart | /reload
/commits
/queue
/approve <id> | /reject <id> | /edit <id> <json>See Telegram Bot setup guide for full configuration.
Auto-start at login
One command installs the right service for your OS — no manual plist or unit file editing:
devtrack autostart-install # macOS → launchd LaunchAgent
# Linux/systemd → ~/.config/systemd/user/devtrack.service
# WSL without systemd → shell profile block
devtrack autostart-status # show current auto-start status
devtrack autostart-uninstall # remove auto-startRelevant DevTrack runtime variables from the current environment are baked into the service definition
at install time so the daemon starts correctly even in a login session without a shell profile.
Re-run autostart-install after changing the environment file.
The daemon enforces a single running instance using an OS-level file lock (Data/devtrack.lock). On Windows this is a mandatory lock; on Unix a cooperative flock. Attempting to start a second instance prints a clear error and exits immediately rather than running in parallel and corrupting shared state.
Interactive setup wizard (devtrack setup)
Walks through every required setting interactively and writes the result for you:
devtrack setupWhat it does:
Checks Git is installed before proceeding
Prompts for operating mode (Managed / External) and LLM provider credentials
Reuses an installed generation-capable Ollama model without downloading a prescribed model
When Ollama still needs a model, can retain an already-present OpenAI/Anthropic key as an explicit temporary fallback; key values are never displayed and declining keeps setup local-only
In Managed mode, starts the optional Python checkout,
uv sync --extra ai, and the needed local Ollama generation and embedding model pull in a detached worker; setup does not wait for themGenerates the registered XDG environment file with visible runtime defaults and an auto-generated
ADMIN_SECRET_KEYIn Managed mode, writes and validates the required PostgreSQL connection configuration
Creates the
~/.devtrack/configuration directory and writesworkspaces.yamlthereWrites
WORKSPACES_FILEinto the generated environment file, pointing at the workspace fileRegisters shell integration automatically in
.bashrcor.zshrcon Unix and the PowerShell profile on WindowsWrites
~/.devtrack/devtrack.confpointing at the generated environment file
After devtrack setup completes, run devtrack start — no manual source .env needed. Git
monitoring, local SQLite, scheduling, and MCP are ready while the optional AI server finishes in the
background. Use devtrack doctor or devtrack status for progress; retry a failed bootstrap with
devtrack doctor --repair.
Automatic .env loading
The daemon automatically finds and loads .env at startup. Resolution order:
DEVTRACK_ENV_FILEenvironment variable (explicit path)Path recorded in
~/.devtrack/devtrack.conf(written bydevtrack setup).envfile next to thedevtrackbinary
You no longer need to manually source .env before devtrack start for most setups. The env-first rule still applies for devtrack autostart-install — run it after devtrack setup so the service bakes the correct variables.
Uninstall (devtrack uninstall)
devtrack uninstall # confirm, then remove DevTrack and its data
devtrack uninstall --keep-data # remove DevTrack but preserve the data directory
devtrack uninstall --yes # skip the confirmation promptThe uninstall command asks once for confirmation unless --yes is supplied. It:
Stops the running daemon (if active)
Removes the autostart entry (launchd on macOS, systemd on Linux, Task Scheduler on Windows)
Deletes the configured DevTrack data home, including managed-server files, unless
--keep-datais suppliedRemoves the
devtrackbinary fromPATH
The command prints the resolved targets before confirmation. There is no --dry-run flag.
Self-update (devtrack upgrade)
devtrack upgrade # download and install the latest release binary
sudo devtrack upgrade # use when the binary is in a root-owned directory (e.g. /usr/local/bin)What happens on upgrade:
Downloads the latest binary for your OS/arch from GitHub Releases (
sraj0501/Devtrack_) — Linux/macOS use.tar.gz; Windows uses a direct.exeApplies all versioned migrations that have not yet run (schema changes, config file moves, etc.)
Auto-restarts the daemon so the new binary takes effect immediately
On Unix: falls back to
sudo cpautomatically if the target directory is root-owned and the command wasn't run as rootOn Windows: if a permission error occurs, a message is printed asking you to re-run the command as Administrator
Post-commit hooks for all workspaces
devtrack workspace install-hooks # install post-commit hook in every enabled workspaceNormally DevTrack installs hooks when the daemon starts. Use this command to push hooks to all workspaces at once — useful after adding new repos to workspaces.yaml.
Webhook + Trigger server (HTTP mode)
The Go daemon spawns backend.webhook_server as a subprocess in the default managed mode. In external/Docker mode the server runs separately and the Go daemon connects to it over HTTPS. Either way the same FastAPI server handles both:
Inbound webhooks from Azure DevOps, GitHub, GitLab, and Jira at
/webhooks/<source>Outbound triggers from the Go daemon at
/trigger/commitand/trigger/timer
# external/Docker mode only — managed mode starts this automatically
cd devtrack_server && uv run python -m backend.webhook_serverAll trigger endpoints require the X-DevTrack-API-Key header (set DEVTRACK_API_KEY in .env). Webhook signature verification uses source-specific secrets (AZURE_WEBHOOK_SECRET, GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET, etc.). GitLab webhooks are registered automatically at startup when GITLAB_WEBHOOK_URL is configured.
The stable request and response shapes, authentication rules, and matching Go/Python contract tests are documented in the HTTP API contract.
Claude Code / MCP Integration (Phase 8)
DevTrack exposes a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server so Claude Code automatically knows your active ticket, commit voice, and pending queue — no manual context-setting needed.
devtrack mcp— starts the MCP server in stdio mode (the transport Claude Code uses)devtrack mcp serve --database PATH— starts it against an explicitly selecteddevtrack.db(used by packaged MCPB installs)devtrack mcp setup— writes.mcp.jsonin the current directory so Claude Code discovers the server automatically on next launchdevtrack mcp status— shows the registered tools and server infodevtrack mcp test— runs an in-process smoke test without starting a full serverSix SQLite-backed tools:
get_active_context,get_today_commits,get_pending_actions,get_voice_profile,get_ticket_context,get_eod_summary. Each declares a title and read-only, non-destructive, idempotent safety annotations.The stdio handshake negotiates finalized MCP versions through
2025-11-25, retaining older-client compatibility. The newer2026-07-28per-request protocol is not supported yet.Reproducible MCPB 0.3 bundles ship for Windows amd64, macOS amd64/arm64, and Linux amd64/arm64. During bundle installation, select the
devtrack.dbcreated bydevtrack setup. Published bundle hashes are recorded in the release'schecksums.txtand official MCP Registry metadata.Dockerfile.mcpis the minimal Linux stdio image used for directory build/introspection checks. It creates disposable SQLite state and is separate fromdevtrack_server/Dockerfile, which runs the optional Python HTTP backend. The root.dockerignorekeeps local credentials and runtime data out of that build context.
# One-time setup — run from your repo root
devtrack mcp setup # writes .mcp.json
# Restart Claude Code — it will connect automatically via stdio
devtrack mcp status # verify tools are registered
devtrack mcp test # smoke-test the server in-processSource: devtrack_client/internal/mcp/ (server core) and devtrack_client/mcp_cmd.go (CLI).
Development-agent playbooks
The repository retains five historical Claude role definitions under
.claude/agents/_archive/ and keeps the current role, memory, and
authorization contract in
.claude/memory/project_local_agents.md. These are
project-maintenance assets, not devtrack CLI commands, and the archived files are not advertised
as automatically installed Claude slash commands. A contributor's Codex or agent environment may
install adapters for the same roles separately.
Role | Responsibility |
project-vision | Break plans into board tasks and enforce vision and authorization boundaries |
devtrack-engineer | Implement an approved |
git-agent | Perform explicitly authorized Git plumbing without expanding the requested scope |
memory-compactor | Reconcile durable project memory without discarding still-relevant decisions |
post-generator | Turn engineer-log evidence into held dev.to, Hacker News, and LinkedIn drafts under |
The documentation-maintenance workflow is checked in at
.claude/commands/docu-agent.md; how a contributor invokes it
depends on their local agent environment. The planning and
engineering roles use Data/agent_logs/project_board.md as their durable contract, while verified
implementation history is recorded in Data/agent_logs/engineer_log.md. Role names alone do not
authorize commits, pushes, PR operations, releases, publication, or deployment.
Anonymous telemetry — opt-in, off by default
DevTrack sends nothing unless you explicitly opt in:
devtrack telemetry status # DISABLED by default
devtrack telemetry on # opt in
devtrack telemetry off # opt back out at any timeIf (and only if) you opt in, the daemon sends an anonymous install/daily-active ping containing a random install UUID, a hashed hardware fingerprint, the event type (install / active), OS, arch, and version. Never code, commit text, diffs, ticket contents, or personal data.
The setting is stored locally and read directly by the daemon, so it works in every operating mode — including lightweight, with no server running.
Admin console (CS-3)
A browser-based admin console built with FastAPI + HTMX. Start it with:
The admin console is server-owned. Run it from devtrack_server/ with
uv run python -m backend.admin, or set ADMIN_EMBED=true to mount it on the managed webhook
server at /admin. The Go client intentionally has no admin-start command.
Sign in with ADMIN_USERNAME / ADMIN_PASSWORD (set in .env). The dashboard shows live trigger-activity stats (triggers today, commits today, last trigger time, errors in the last 24 h) that refresh every 30 seconds via HTMX without a full page reload.
Pages and capabilities:
Page | What you can do |
Dashboard | Health overview, trigger throughput stats, quick links |
Users | Create/delete users, change roles ( |
API Keys | Generate and revoke per-user API keys |
License | View current license tier, seat count, and terms acceptance status |
Server | Real-time process table (CPU %, memory, health) with restart/stop/start controls |
Audit Log | Full history of all admin actions |
Single-process mode (ADMIN_EMBED): By default the admin console runs as a separate process on ADMIN_PORT (default 8090). Set ADMIN_EMBED=true to mount the admin router directly on the main webhook server at /admin — no extra port, no extra process:
# .env
ADMIN_EMBED=true # mount admin at /admin on the webhook server (port 8089)
# or leave false (default) to run on a dedicated port:
ADMIN_PORT=8090Required .env keys for the admin console:
ADMIN_USERNAME=admin
ADMIN_PASSWORD=changeme # plain text (dev) or bcrypt hash ($2b$...)
ADMIN_SECRET_KEY=<random-string> # JWT signing key — generate with: openssl rand -hex 32
ADMIN_PORT=8090 # ignored when ADMIN_EMBED=true
ADMIN_EMBED=falseRuntime visibility
devtrack status # daemon, capabilities, and managed-bootstrap progress
devtrack doctor # configuration and dependency diagnosis
devtrack doctor --repair # retry a failed managed-server bootstrap
devtrack tui # full-screen client dashboard
devtrack logs -f # follow daemon logsThe Python server TUI remains available to server operators with
cd devtrack_server && uv run python -m backend.server_tui; it is not a Go-client command. Its
trigger-throughput pane reads the Go daemon's internal stats endpoint when PostgreSQL mode is active
and degrades to zero-valued stats when that endpoint is unavailable.
The daemon health subsystem checks these monitored services:
Check | What is verified |
Daemon process | PID file present and process alive |
Python backend |
|
SQLite | Database file readable and schema valid |
Ollama |
|
Ports | Bound ports recorded and checked across restarts |
The last-known port list is persisted so runtime diagnostics can report conflicts across restarts.
Deployment modes
Mode |
| How | Use case |
Managed (default) |
| Daemon spawns Python automatically | Local dev — full AI features |
Lightweight |
| Go daemon only — no Python | Git monitoring + scheduling without a Python environment |
External |
| Python runs on a separate server; set | Docker / self-hosted backend |
Cloud | — |
| Remote managed backend |
devtrack setup prompts for Managed or External mode on first run and writes the choice to the
generated environment file. lightweight remains a supported manual configuration value: it maps
to the same internal non-managed mode as external, so the daemon does not spawn Python. Go-native
features continue; server-backed calls use the configured (or loopback fallback) URL and degrade if
no backend is reachable.
DevTrack runs natively — a Go binary plus a
uv-managed Python server. The Go client keeps its offline source of truth in local SQLite and does not connect to a database server. PostgreSQL is mandatory for Python-server persistence and server-side events; MongoDB remains optional as a Teams voice-learning source. Server startup validates PostgreSQL and advances the Alembic schema before accepting traffic; there is no server-side SQLite fallback.
Python AI server
Managed mode (default): devtrack setup configures the deterministic server location and starts
a background sparse checkout into ~/.local/share/devtrack/server/, followed by uv sync --extra ai
and, for the local Ollama provider, preparation of the generation model and nomic-embed-text.
An opted-in cloud-key fast lane remains a fallback behind Ollama, so local inference takes over as
soon as the model is ready. The wizard does not wait for these steps;
devtrack doctor shows durable progress and failures. No manual dependency setup is needed.
External mode (server on a separate host): clone the repo on that host,
cd devtrack_server && uv sync --extra ai && uv run python -m backend.webhook_server.
Set DEVTRACK_SERVER_URL on the client machine.
See docs/INSTALLATION.md for the full setup walkthrough.
Technology
Layer | Stack |
Daemon / CLI | Go 1.24+, fsnotify, robfig/cron, modernc/sqlite |
AI backend | Python 3.12+, uv, aiohttp, LLM-first structured task parsing |
Local LLM | Ollama (default) · OpenAI · Anthropic · Groq · LM Studio |
Storage | Client SQLite (offline state), server PostgreSQL (required), ChromaDB (RAG), optional MongoDB |
Remote control | Go-native Telegram bot · outbound Slack webhook notifier |
PM integrations | Azure DevOps · GitLab · GitHub · Jira REST APIs |
Admin console | FastAPI + HTMX, JWT auth, bcrypt passwords, PostgreSQL-backed user/audit data |
Observability | runtime-narrative — structured story/stage traces on every webhook request |
Config discipline | All Python modules use |
Documentation
Full user guides live on the project website: devtrack.cloud.
Key references in this repo:
I want to… | Go to |
Understand where the product is going | PRODUCT_BIBLE.md — the source of truth |
Install it | |
Verify the real local workflow | |
Understand the architecture | |
Maintain the Go↔Python HTTP boundary | |
Review what DevTrack wants to send | |
See the client↔server split | |
Set up the Telegram bot | |
Set up interactively (new users) | |
Run without Python (Lightweight mode) | |
Deploy only the Python backend on a server | |
Manage users, licenses, and API keys in a browser | |
Update / remove DevTrack | |
Understand the development-agent roles and authorization boundaries | |
Connect Claude Code via MCP (Phase 8) |
Releasing
The canonical release pipeline is .github/workflows/release.yml.
It runs when an authorized maintainer pushes a semantic-version tag:
GIT_NO_DEVTRACK=1 git tag -a vX.Y.Z -m "Release vX.Y.Z"
GIT_NO_DEVTRACK=1 git push origin vX.Y.ZGitHub Actions runs the Go tests, cross-compiles Linux amd64/arm64, macOS amd64/arm64, and Windows
amd64, validates the generated MCPB manifests, then publishes the platform binaries/tarballs and
five matching .mcpb bundles. It also publishes SHA-256 checksums, server.json, and the official
MCP Registry record through GitHub OIDC. v3.1.0 is the first release produced by this complete path.
Update release-facing website copy in the same release change.
The older scripts/release.ps1 helper is retained for local maintainer workflows, but it is not the
source of truth for published asset names or CI behavior.
Testing
cd devtrack_client && go test ./... # Go client suite
cd devtrack_client && go vet ./... # lint
cd devtrack_server && uv sync --extra ai # full managed feature/test dependencies
cd devtrack_server && uv run pytest backend/tests/ # Python server suite
cd devtrack_server && uv run pytest backend/tests/ -k <name> # filter by nameRun the credential-free, no-send product path from the repository root:
.\scripts\e2e.ps1 # native Windows
.\scripts\e2e-local.ps1 # Windows, then WSL or Docker-hosted Linuxsh ./scripts/e2e.sh # native LinuxThese scripts build the current client in temporary storage, observe a real disposable commit, and
verify its SQLite-backed MCP context. The End-to-end workflow runs the
Windows and Linux scripts in GitHub Actions; both hosted lanes pass on dev. Packaged-build
acceptance and privacy-reviewed media qualification remain separate release follow-ups.
Python business logic must use backend.config typed accessors rather than adding direct environment
reads. Missing required variables produce a ConfigError with the variable name rather than a
silent None.
Privacy
The default Go + SQLite + Ollama path is local and works without internet. Configured external services receive the minimum context required for the operation you enabled.
Cloud LLMs are optional. OpenAI/Anthropic/Groq are used only if configured. The prompt may include commit messages, diff context, or work text required by the feature being invoked; do not enable a cloud provider if that conflicts with project policy.
Nothing is posted without review. All outbound actions are staged in the pending-actions queue until you approve them.
Telemetry is opt-in and off by default (
devtrack telemetry status). No pings are sent unless you rundevtrack telemetry on.Voice learning is local in managed mode by default. Git-history seeding is local; Teams and external-server learning sources require explicit configuration. Learning data can be wiped with
devtrack learning-reset.
License
DevTrack Community License — free for personal use and teams up to 10 users. Enterprise (11+ users) requires a paid license.
devtrack terms # read the terms
devtrack terms --accept # accept non-interactively (e.g. in CI)Full text: TERMS.md
Available Tools
6 toolsget_active_contextGet active work contextARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns the developer's current active ticket, repo path, today's commit count, and confidence in the ticket mapping. This is the primary context tool — call it first.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description aligns with the annotations (readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false) by using 'Returns', and it adds genuinely useful behavioral detail by disclosing that the ticket mapping carries a confidence score — signaling the mapping may be imperfect. No error, rate-limit, or edge-case behavior is disclosed, but for a read-only no-parameter getter, the transparency is adequate and non-contradictory.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two tight sentences: the first front-loads the return payload with concrete fields, the second delivers the usage priority. Every word carries information; there is no filler, redundancy, or buried context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's low complexity (no parameters, no output schema, simple annotations), the description covers the essential ground: what data comes back and when to call it. It does not describe the output format or edge-case behavior (e.g., what happens when no ticket is active), but for a simple getter the listed fields plus the 'call first' guidance are reasonably complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters and 100% schema coverage (empty object), there is nothing for the description to clarify. The rubric's baseline of 4 for a zero-parameter tool applies; the description correctly avoids inventing parameter explanations, so no deduction is warranted.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ('Returns') and names the precise resource and payload: the active ticket, repo path, today's commit count, and confidence in the ticket mapping. This clearly differentiates it from siblings like get_ticket_context (single ticket), get_today_commits (commit list), and get_eod_summary (end-of-day view), making the aggregate-snapshot purpose unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The explicit directive 'This is the primary context tool — call it first' gives strong, actionable guidance on when to invoke it as the entry point. It stops short of naming sibling tools or stating when NOT to use it (e.g., when a detailed ticket or commit breakdown is needed), but the priority instruction is clear and sufficient for an agent to sequence correctly.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_eod_summaryGet end-of-day summaryARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns today's EOD narrative draft — a summary of the day's commits grouped by ticket, suitable for a standup or daily report. Template-based (no LLM required).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds that it is template-based and requires no LLM, which gives extra insight into its deterministic behavior without contradicting the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that clearly conveys the tool's purpose and key characteristics without unnecessary verbosity. It is well-structured and easy to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has no parameters and no output schema, the description fully explains what it returns (EOD narrative draft) and its intended use. No additional information is needed for an agent to understand and invoke the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters, making schema coverage trivially 100%. The description adds no parameter details since none exist, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns today's EOD narrative draft, a summary of commits grouped by ticket. It uses a specific verb ('Returns') and a specific resource, and the 'no LLM required' note differentiates it from potentially similar generation tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides a context ('suitable for a standup or daily report') but does not explicitly compare with sibling tools like get_today_commits or get_active_context. It lacks an explicit 'use this instead of X when...' statement, so guidance is implied rather than direct.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_pending_actionsGet pending actionsARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns the current pending actions queue — actions DevTrack wants to take but hasn't yet. Each action has a confidence score and an expiry time.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior, which the description aligns with by simply returning data. No side effects or permissions are described, but the annotations cover these aspects, and the description adds context about the returned data.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise, using two sentences to convey purpose and output structure. Every word adds value, and there is no redundancy or unnecessary detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given there is no output schema, the description provides sufficient context by mentioning that each action has a confidence score and expiry time. This gives the agent a reasonable expectation of the result format, though it does not enumerate all possible fields or variations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters, and the schema coverage is complete (0 parameters). The baseline for 0 parameters is 4, and the description does not introduce any parameter-related ambiguity. It correctly focuses on the output instead.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: returning the current pending actions queue. It also provides specific details about the content (confidence score, expiry time) and the subject (DevTrack), making it distinct from generic getters. The verb 'returns' is explicit.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when pending actions are needed, but it does not explicitly mention when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_active_context or get_today_commits. No alternative tools are referenced, so guidance is only implicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_ticket_contextGet ticket contextARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns full context for a named ticket: recent commits, current pending actions targeting it, and its last activity time.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticket_id | Yes | The ticket ID, e.g. PROJ-123 or AB-7 |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds no further behavioral details (e.g., rate limits, errors, side effects) but also does not contradict the annotations, so a neutral score is appropriate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, focused sentence that front-loads the primary purpose and lists the returned components without unnecessary verbosity. It is highly concise and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description lists the key components of the returned context (commits, actions, last activity), which gives a clear idea of what the tool provides. It does not specify output structure or error cases, but for a simple read-only context tool, it is reasonably complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter ticket_id is well-described with an example in the schema. The description does not add additional semantic nuance beyond what the schema already provides, so it meets the baseline for high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns full context for a named ticket, listing specific components (recent commits, recent actions, last activity). The verb 'returns' and the resource 'ticket' are explicit, and it distinguishes itself from siblings like get_active_context by focusing on a named ticket.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage by stating it returns context for a named ticket, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_active_context or get_pending_actions. No when-not-to-use guidance is provided, leaving some ambiguity.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_today_commitsGet today's commitsARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns all commits from today, grouped by ticket ID, with message and metadata.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo_path | No | Filter by repository path. Omit for all repos. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description ('Returns') aligns with the readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false annotations, with no contradiction. It does not add extra behavioral details beyond the annotations, but the annotations already cover safety, so the description is adequate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no redundant words. It delivers all necessary information efficiently, with the key details front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without an output schema, the description provides some output context ('with message and metadata') to hint at the return structure. This is sufficient for a simple tool, though a bit more detail could improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description for repo_path ('Filter by repository path. Omit for all repos.') fully explains the parameter, achieving 100% coverage. The main description does not add further parameter context, so it stays at the baseline for schema-covered parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Returns'), the resource ('commits'), and the scope ('from today', grouped by ticket ID). None of the sibling tools (e.g., get_eod_summary, get_ticket_context) overlap with commit retrieval, so it is easily distinguished.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explains what the tool does but does not explicitly state when to use it over alternatives or provide usage conditions. Since siblings are distinct, the lack of explicit guidance is acceptable, but it does not meet the 'explicit when/when-not' standard.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_voice_profileGet voice profileARead-onlyIdempotent
Returns the developer's inferred writing style profile for a given context type. Use this to understand how the developer prefers to communicate before generating text on their behalf.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| context_type | No | The writing context to retrieve style inferences for. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description does not add any additional behavioral traits such as caching, error conditions, or side effects. It simply says 'returns', which is consistent with the annotations but does not go beyond them, so it meets the baseline but not higher.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences long, free of jargon or redundant phrases, and gets straight to the point. It clearly states what the tool does and when to use it without any unnecessary details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple getter with a single parameter and no output schema, the description is complete. It tells the agent what the tool returns, the purpose of the parameter, and the use case, so nothing essential is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description for context_type already explains it as 'The writing context to retrieve style inferences for' with an enumerated list of values. The tool description only repeats this in different words ('given context type') without adding any new meaning or nuance, so the description adds no value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it returns a writing style profile for a given context type, which is distinct from the sibling tools that deal with other types of information. The verb 'returns' is specific and the resource 'developer's inferred writing style profile' is well-defined.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It explicitly says to use this tool to understand the developer's communication preferences before generating text, which is a clear when-to-use. However, it does not mention when not to use it or compare it to alternative tools, such as get_active_context or get_today_commits, so it lacks the explicit alternatives that would earn a 5.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
6 tool updates
v3.1.1- First observed
get_active_context - First observed
get_eod_summary - First observed
get_pending_actions - First observed
get_ticket_context - First observed
get_today_commits - First observed
get_voice_profile
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose: active context, EOD summary, pending actions, ticket context, today's commits, and voice profile. Some overlap exists around commit data, but the descriptions clearly differentiate raw commits, summaries, and ticket-specific views.
All tool names follow a consistent get_<noun> pattern with clear, descriptive suffixes. There is no mixing of naming conventions or vague verb choices.
With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for a developer-context server. Each tool covers a meaningful slice of the domain without unnecessary bloat.
The read-only context domain is well covered: active state, daily commits, pending actions, ticket details, EOD summary, and communication style. There is no obvious missing getter, though a way to browse historical days or all tickets could be considered a minor gap.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Opinionated sprint tracker. Read/update tickets, sprints, velocity from Claude/Cursor/Zed.
- DoneThatOAuthai.donethat
Privacy-first work tracking with summaries, reports, coaching, and AI-ready long-term memory.
Task management for people and autonomous AI developers: tasks, stories, work logs, pull requests.
AI-native git hosting — repos, PRs, issues, CI gates, and AI code review over MCP (60 tools).
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA unified developer toolkit for AI-assisted workflows. Task timing, doc drift detection, env validation, secret scanning, port conflict resolution, AI context generation, and license auditing — one MCP server, one install.73MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceDeveloper Knowledge OS — local-first bimodal workspace for humans (TUI) and AI agents (MCP). Manage Git repos, vault notes, and assets with 19 MCP tools including unified project context queries.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first dev memory: indexes Git commits, PRs, Jira/Linear tickets, Confluence docs, Slack threads, and Calendar events into a local SQLite/FTS5/ONNX index, and exposes them as MCP tools so Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex can search and cite your past work.174MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal MCP server that lets your AI coding agent query its own cross-tool project history - file/command freshness, past test failures, cost & token spend, cache status, and session handoff - over stdio, 100% local, no telemetry.48-