Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
claude-concilium

claude-concilium

by spyrae
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to claude-concilium

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • @h0wzy/mcp

      H0wZy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables multi-agent AI collaboration by connecting Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and Google Antigravity, providing cross-model code reviews, independent second opinions, and autonomous validation through MCP tools.
      1
      MIT

    • CoAgent8

      oktawianwybieralski
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      CoAgent8 lets your coding agent consult another one. As an MCP server, it exposes Codex, Claude Code, and Antigravity (Gemini & more) via 6 unified tools. Your agent asks for a second opinion or a review of your Git diff, receiving feedback directly in chat. The peer agent runs locally in read-only mode via your existing, authenticated CLI.
      6
      92 npm
      2
      MIT

    • personal-mcp

      buYoung
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that bridges coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI) via ACP for pair programming, enabling agents to consult each other as tools.
      3
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: openai_chat for general prompts and openai_review specifically for code reviews. The description of openai_chat explicitly directs users to openai_review for code review, eliminating any ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent pattern: openai_ prefix with a descriptive verb/noun (chat, review). The naming style is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal but acceptable for a focused purpose (quick, non-interactive OpenAI access). The count is on the low end, but the scope is clearly limited.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers two core use cases: general chat and code review. However, lacking features like model listing, parameter configuration, or other common OpenAI operations leaves notable gaps for a broader 'concilium' purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessLimited data

    Resources