Skip to main content
Glama
spranab

Saga MCP

by spranab
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Saga MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Flow

      joelborch
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Agent-first project management MCP server that enables AI agents to manage tasks, spaces, lists, boards, subtasks, comments, and automations via natural language, with full audit trail and real-time sync.
      6,899 npm
      MIT

    • Project Tracker MCP Server

      spranab
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing hierarchical project tracking with PostgreSQL. Enables AI agents to create, read, update, and delete projects, epics, stories, summaries, status updates, context, and issues.
      40
      2
      -

    • mindpm

      umitkavala
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server providing persistent project memory via SQLite, tracking tasks, decisions, notes, sessions, and context. Includes a Kanban board and session briefs with git activity, enabling LLMs to resume work seamlessly.
      24
      82 npm
      8
      Apache 2.0

    • task-orchestrator

      jpicklyk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Server-enforced workflow discipline for AI agents. An MCP server providing persistent work items, dependency graphs, quality gates, and actor attribution. Schemas define what agents must produce — the server blocks the call if they don't. Works with any MCP-compatible client.
      206
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 41 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct resource-action pairs (task_create vs epic_create), but some overlap: tracker_init initializes a project while project_create creates one; tracker_dashboard, tracker_session_diff, and activity_log all provide overview/activity info, though with different scopes. Also task_get vs task_list vs tracker_search could create some selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent noun_verb pattern (e.g., task_create, task_update, epic_list, note_save). Exceptions like note_save (verb_noun) and activity_log (noun_noun) break the pattern, and tracker_* and template_* prefixes are mixed but still readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    41 tools is excessive for a project management server, even with comprehensive functionality. Many tools could be consolidated (e.g., note_save could be split into create/update, or tracker_export/import are edge-case features). This is well beyond the typical 3-15 tool sweet spot and creates cognitive load.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is remarkably complete: full lifecycle for projects, epics, tasks, subtasks, notes, comments, and templates. Includes reordering, soft-delete with restore, batch operations, search, dashboard, diff, and import/export. There are no obvious dead ends; every entity has create/read/update/delete plus additional utilities.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources