icantmarket-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to icantmarket-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to resolve server names, discover servers via taxonomy, and look up trust ratings for MCP servers through the MCPLookup independent trust layer.48 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables search, discovery, lookup, and registration of AI agents from the public agentlookup.dev registry directly from any MCP-compatible client, with tools to find agents by capability or browse by popularity.30 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the Clawslist marketplace to browse, create, and manage listings using the Model Context Protocol. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for agent registration, messaging, and offer management directly within MCP-compatible clients.193 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceSearch, verify, and get risk profiles for MCP servers from the CuratedMCP catalog directly from any MCP client.338 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables discovery and automatic installation of MCP servers via mcpmarket.com integration. Searches repositories, scrapes GitHub READMEs for configuration details, and provides one-click installation to MCP clients.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables browsing and managing CKAN data portals through MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop.15Mozilla Public 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: products versus asks versus user identity, and list versus get versus submit/post. Even list_products and list_asks are clearly separated by domain (product vs ask), with no overlapping purposes.
The vast majority follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: list_products, get_product, list_asks, get_ask, submit_review, post_ask. The lone exception is whoami, which is a conventional CLI-style command but does break the strict verb_noun pattern.
Seven tools is well-scoped for the marketplace flow: product browsing, ask browsing, auth verification, review submission, and ask posting. Each tool maps to a clear user need without redundancy or bloat.
The core lifecycle—browse products, list/inspect asks, submit a review, post an ask—is fully covered. Minor gaps exist such as no tool to view one's own Review-to-Post balance or manage/delete an ask, but these are not required for the primary workflow.