Image Scraper MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_imagesA | Search for images on DuckDuckGo and return image URLs with full source attribution (source page URL, publisher domain, article title, image dimensions). Each result carries credit info so callers can attribute the image instead of just seeing a proxied redirect URL. Uses Selenium to scrape image results from DuckDuckGo Images. |
| search_maps_imagesA | Search Google Maps for a place and return photo URLs from the place page. Accepts a place name like 'Eiffel Tower' or 'Joe's Pizza NYC'. Uses Selenium to scrape photos from the Google Maps place panel — no API key required. Returns a JSON object with each photo's URL, author, and author profile URL so callers can credit the photographer if they reuse the image. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
Both tools search for images but from distinct sources (DuckDuckGo vs Google Maps), with clear descriptions that eliminate confusion.
Both tool names follow a consistent 'verb_noun' pattern ('search_images' and 'search_maps_images'), with no mixing of conventions.
With only two tools, the server feels minimal for an 'Image Scraper' scope, though it may be intentionally focused on two specific sources.
The tool set lacks coverage for common image search sources (e.g., Google, Bing) and offers no download or metadata extraction tools, leaving significant gaps.