setup_help

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It conveys a read-only behavior of showing instructions, but does not explicitly mention the absence of side effects or describe the output format. For such a simple tool, the risk is low, but it could be more explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the action ('Muestra instrucciones') and includes the domain ('CommerceHub'). Every word serves a clear purpose, and there is no unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity—no parameters, no output schema, and a clear help utility—the description fully conveys its purpose and scope. It is complete within the context of sibling tools, which all have different functions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the schema description coverage is 100%. Per the rubric, a baseline of 4 is appropriate for no parameters, and the description does not need to explain any.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Muestra instrucciones de configuración de CommerceHub' (Shows setup instructions for CommerceHub), using a specific verb and resource. It uniquely distinguishes itself from the operational sibling tools, which all focus on data operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The usage is implied: it is the tool for obtaining setup instructions, as no sibling tool serves a similar purpose. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when to use it vs alternatives or any prerequisites, so it does not fully meet the criteria for clear context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.