Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to sigma-gate

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A drop-in proxy that guards MCP servers with policy enforcement, secret redaction, prompt-injection screening, rug-pull detection, rate limiting, and audit logging.
      12
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Security scanner and MCP server that catches dangerous patterns in MCP servers and AI agent projects, such as leaked secrets, shell execution, and prompt-injection text. Runs as both a CLI and MCP server with CI-friendly severity gates.
      2
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent security guardrails. Provides input validation, prompt injection detection, PII redaction, output filtering, policy enforcement, rate limiting, and comprehensive audit logging.
      38
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables sub-millisecond pre-execution safety filtering for AI agent tool calls, blocking destructive shell commands, dangerous SQL mutations, credential access, SSRF, and scope-creep or prompt-injection patterns before they execute, with optional fail-closed transparent proxy wrapping for any MCP server.
      6
      334
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Unified MCP safety server that detects prompt injection (75 patterns), scans LLM outputs for leaked secrets/PII, enforces API cost budgets, and creates signed audit trails. Zero ML dependencies, pure Python.
      17
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI security scanning. Detects prompt injections, jailbreaks, data exfiltration, and social engineering attacks in real-time using 42 regex patterns via the ClawGuard Shield API. Sub-10ms response times.
      5
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools serve clearly different functions: guard performs the actual security detection, while guard_selftest verifies the gate's functionality. There is no ambiguity between running a check and testing the checker.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools share the 'guard' prefix, making the relationship obvious. The names are short, readable, and follow a consistent pattern (guard and guard_selftest).

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal but appropriately scoped for a single deterministic gate plus a self-test. The count is borderline on the low end but matches the focused utility.

    Completeness5/5

    The domain is fully covered: guard runs all detection types in one call and returns block reasons, while guard_selftest validates all detection classes. There are no missing operations for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues