Skip to main content
Glama
spanlens
by spanlens

Related Servers

Alternatives to spanlens-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for querying AI usage metrics (exact tokens, cost, latency, errors, productivity) from a local SQLite database, enabling charts and analysis in Claude Code and Cursor.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A terminal live-tail and a browser dashboard — one process, one event stream, served from localhost. Unified timeline across Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Hermes, and OpenClaw. Token + cost accounting, compaction + anomaly detection, hybrid search, SVG call graphs, monaco-style diff attribution, agent-aware replay ("what would the agent say if I edited the prompt?"), policy editor, MCP s
      15 npm
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP-native agent evaluation and observability server. Log traces, evaluate output quality with 12 built-in rules (PII detection, prompt injection, cost thresholds), and track agent costs. Real-time dashboard, OTel-compatible spans. Self-hosted, MIT licensed.
      9
      1,358 npm
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects Claude (or any MCP compatible client) to your existing log infrastructure. Query, summarize, and trace logs in plain English across GCP Cloud Logging, AWS CloudWatch, Azure Log Analytics, Grafana Loki, and Elasticsearch without writing filter expressions or leaving your editor.
      20 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first, multi-provider cost meter for LLM usage, exposed as MCP tools. Captures every call into a local SQLite ledger and lets any coding agent query spend, compare providers, and get recommendations — no cloud, no account. First-class support for Chinese providers (Qwen, DeepSeek) alongside Anthropic and OpenAI.
      7
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: anomalies, savings, stats, trace details, user analytics, trace listing, and request queries. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, query_). No mixing of cases or styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for an LLM monitoring server. Each tool earns its place without being excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness5/5

    Covers anomalies, savings, stats, traces, user analytics, and individual requests. The surface is complete for monitoring and analysis, with no obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive