Cargo Doc MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_crate_docA | Get crate's main documentation page. Useful for unresolved imports (e.g. use get_crate_doc when seeing 'unresolved import tokio::sync') or understanding crate features. |
| list_symbolsB | List all symbols in a crate. Use when implementing traits or exploring available types. Shows structs, enums, traits with their paths. |
| search_docB | Search crate docs for specific features, error messages, or usage examples. Helps debug compilation issues or learn new APIs. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_crate_doc retrieves main documentation pages, list_symbols enumerates all symbols in a crate, and search_doc performs targeted searches within documentation. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the appropriate tool based on the task.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_crate_doc, list_symbols, search_doc) with clear, descriptive verbs. There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the tool set predictable and easy to understand.
With only 3 tools, the server feels somewhat thin for a documentation-focused domain, as it might lack operations like updating or managing documentation. However, the tools cover core use cases, so it's borderline but not severely mismatched.
The tools provide good coverage for basic documentation tasks: retrieving main docs, listing symbols, and searching. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct support for navigating between documentation sections or handling version-specific docs, but agents can likely work around these limitations.