Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to TinyRAG

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns any folder of PDFs, markdown, and text files into a local, queryable knowledge base exposed as an MCP server. Enables MCP-compatible agents to semantically search indexed documents, retrieve relevant passages with source and relevance scores, list or reindex documents, and inspect cache and token usage — instead of reading whole files into context.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first document retrieval engine that mounts as an MCP tool for agents to index files, search for relevant passages, and let the agent's own LLM answer.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to connect local knowledge bases, preview and index selected directories, search for traceable snippets with source metadata, and read indexed document versions through MCP tools.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, deep-read, and build knowledge bases from Markdown, PDF, DOCX, and PPTX documents via MCP tools for retrieval, document navigation, and ingestion.
      16 npm
      643
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    query_knowledge_base and search_relevant_chunks both search the knowledge base for relevant content, differing only in whether the response is generated or raw chunks. An agent might select the wrong one if not attentive. list_documents is clearly distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: query_, list_, search_. The naming is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is an appropriate size for a focused RAG server, covering retrieval and listing without unnecessary bulk.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover querying and listing but lack document management (add, update, delete). This is a notable gap for a knowledge base server, though the core retrieval workflow is present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues