Skip to main content
Glama
sourcefuse

Robot Framework MCP Server

by sourcefuse

Related Servers

Alternatives to Robot Framework MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      RobotMCP is a comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that bridges the gap between human language and Robot Framework automation. It enables AI agents to understand test intentions, execute steps interactively, and generate complete test suites from successful executions.
      19
      2,507 PyPI
      116
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for web automation that enables browser control, element interaction, content extraction, and monitoring using Playwright.
      7
      3 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides browser automation capabilities using Playwright, enabling LLMs to interact with web pages, take screenshots, generate test code, scrape web content, and execute JavaScript in real browser environments.
      31
      11,800 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides browser automation capabilities using Playwright, enabling LLMs to interact with web pages, take screenshots, generate test code, scrape web content, and execute JavaScript in a real browser environment.
      32
      11,800 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct by focusing on different test types (e.g., API integration, data-driven, performance monitoring), but there is notable overlap between 'create_advanced_selenium_keywords' and 'create_extended_selenium_keywords'—both generate Selenium-related keywords, which could confuse an agent about which to use for specific Selenium tasks. The descriptions help differentiate them slightly, but the boundaries are fuzzy.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent 'create_*' or 'validate_*' verb_noun pattern with snake_case, making them predictable and easy to parse. The naming convention is uniform across all eight tools, with no deviations in style or structure.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 8 tools, the count is reasonable and well-scoped for a Robot Framework code generation server, covering various test types and a validation tool. It's slightly on the higher side but not excessive, as each tool serves a distinct purpose in test creation, though some overlap exists.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers code generation for multiple test scenarios (Selenium, API, data-driven, login, performance) and includes syntax validation, but there are notable gaps: it lacks tools for executing tests, managing test suites, or handling other common Robot Framework operations like variable management or reporting. This limits the workflow to creation-only, which agents might find incomplete for full test automation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues