Skip to main content
Glama
sourav2024

technical-seo-mcp

by sourav2024
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to technical-seo-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • claude-seo-kit

      FreeAutomation-Tech
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for SEO auditing that performs technical SEO, content quality, Schema.org, sitemap, hreflang, and GEO checks, returning scores and prioritized fixes.
      MIT

    • mcp-seo-tools

      rog0x
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides a suite of SEO analysis tools for auditing meta tags, headings, links, keyword density, page speed, and sitemaps without requiring external API keys.
      6
      16 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Remote MCP Server –

      hostinger
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready remote MCP server that performs comprehensive SEO audits, providing structured insights on on-page SEO, technical health, and social metadata without requiring local setup.
      30
      -

    • @gridwork/siteaudit

      thegridwork
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that audits websites for accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA/EAA), performance, SEO, design quality, and mobile responsiveness, providing actionable scores, grades, and prioritized fixes.
      6
      MIT

    • aeo-mcp

      arthurcarlsonn
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents tools to inspect a website's visibility to AI answer engines, including crawler permissions, llms.txt, structured data, on-page signals, and a full 29-check AI-readiness audit.
      5
      0
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The aggregate tools (seo_full_audit, crawl_audit) clearly overlap in scope with the individual check_* tools, but descriptions explicitly state that full_audit excludes Lighthouse and that crawl_audit reuses a shared fetch, so the granular/aggregate boundary is legible. check_robots vs check_ai_crawlers could be confused, yet the description clarifies the latter covers meta/X-Robots-Tag and per-bot status. Only these mild overlaps prevent a 5.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (check_*, crawl_audit, run_lighthouse, seo_full_audit). 'check_' dominates uniformly, but the mixed prefixes (check_/crawl_/run_/seo_) and the irregular 'seo_full_audit' are minor deviations from a single convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools sit squarely in the well-scoped 3-15 range. Each tool maps to a distinct technical SEO subsystem (robots, sitemap, hreflang, structured data, rendering, caching, etc.), so none feel redundant filler.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: rendering, HTTPS/redirects, page essentials, caching, structured data, sitemap, robots/AI crawlers, hreflang, URL structure, keyword placement, Lighthouse, and a site crawl. Minor gaps remain (no field/CrUX data, backlink or log-file analysis), but core technical SEO workflows have no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources