Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: one provides connection details, the other provides a documentation URL. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Both tools follow the exact same 'get_' + noun pattern, making the naming perfectly consistent and predictable.

With only 2 tools, the server feels thin but the narrow scope (returning server info) is reasonable. The count sits at the borderline where it is acceptable but not substantial.

For the apparent purpose of providing connection and documentation information, the surface is complete. Minor additions like a status or configuration tool could be imagined, but no obvious gap exists for the stated domain.