Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentPulse MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables targeted company discovery, real-time DNS MX deliverability diagnostics, and clean web Markdown extraction for AI agents.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to audit company domains for Trust Center platforms, compliance certifications, disclosed sub-processors, DNS identity and security records, email hardening, and live status-page health. It supports single-domain and parallel batch audits with structured risk scores and GRC summaries.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run domain and website intelligence checks, including WHOIS/RDAP, DNS and email security, TLS headers, subdomains, tech stack, contacts, SEO, Core Web Vitals, sitemaps, and Wayback page diffs, using the caller's own Apify token.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables domain investors, webmasters, and autonomous agents to perform comprehensive domain audits including brand scoring, TLD tier analysis, and DNS connectivity checks, and to generate strategic brand suffixes and industry compound variations for portfolio expansion.
      2
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables fetching and processing web content with advanced features including batch processing of up to 20 URLs, streaming support, metadata extraction, and multiple output formats (HTML, Markdown, plain text) with enterprise-grade security and global edge performance.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turns any URL into structured web intelligence in one call: SEO/OpenGraph metadata, public contacts, tech-stack fingerprinting, Schema.org data, a security-headers audit, and clean AI-ready Markdown. Anti-SSRF hardened by design.
      10
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four core tools target clearly distinct resources: B2B enrichment, AEO scoring, markdown conversion, and DNS/infra inspection — an agent should have no trouble picking among them. The one soft boundary is batch_enrich_domains, which explicitly re-runs enrichment, AEO scoring, and DNS inspection in bulk, so the model must decide single vs. batch on top of choosing the operation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case and four of five follow a verb_noun pattern (enrich_company_domain, audit_ai_search_readiness, extract_clean_markdown, inspect_domain_infra). The outlier is batch_enrich_domains, which leads with a modifier and uses a different object form than enrich_company_domain, a minor but noticeable deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well within a healthy range and each maps to a distinct capability (single enrichment, bulk enrichment, AEO audit, infra inspection, content extraction). There is no filler tool and no obvious fragmentation that should have been consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main domain-intelligence workflows end to end, including a bulk path for scale. Gaps are minor: extract_clean_markdown has no batch counterpart, bulk mode is gated behind a paid key with no async/job-status or result-retrieval tool, and there is no way to revisit prior enrichment results.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues