MCP OmniFocus
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP OmniFocus
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates with OmniFocus to enable Claude (or other MCP-compatible AI assistants) to interact with your tasks and projects.7769 npm245MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI assistants to query and manage OmniFocus tasks, projects, and tags on macOS.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with OmniFocus on macOS via JXA, supporting task, project, folder, tag, perspective, and search operations.3120 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server that exposes OmniFocus as structured task infrastructure for AI agents, enabling read, write, and filter operations on tasks and projects via natural language.19 PyPI9-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI assistants full control over OmniFocus on macOS, including tasks, projects, tags, folders, perspectives, forecast, notifications, and review workflows.43MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates OmniFocus with Claude Desktop, providing AI-powered access to tasks and projects for enhanced task management and weekly reviews.4769 npm8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between 'list_tasks' and the more specific 'list_tasks_by_project' and 'list_tasks_by_tag', which could cause confusion if an agent needs to choose between general and filtered listing. However, the descriptions clarify the differences, preventing major misselection.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case, such as 'create_task', 'list_inbox', and 'update_task'. This predictability makes the tool set easy to navigate and understand at a glance.
With 12 tools, the server is well-scoped for managing OmniFocus tasks, covering key operations like create, update, complete, and list across inbox, projects, and tags. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy, fitting typical task management workflows.
The tool set provides strong CRUD coverage for tasks (create, update, complete, drop, activate) and comprehensive listing options (inbox, projects, tags, perspectives). A minor gap is the lack of direct project or tag management tools (e.g., create_project), but agents can still handle core task operations effectively.