Create homepages

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a non-readonly, non-destructive operation, so the description does not need to repeat that. It adds 'up to 10' and 'startup pages', but these mostly mirror schema constraints (maxItems) and the resource type. No additional behavioral context such as side effects, auth needs, atomicity, or return behavior is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It communicates the core action immediately ('Create') and includes the key batch limit. Every word earns its place, though this brevity sacrifices content completeness handled elsewhere.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 3 parameters, zero schema descriptions, and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It provides the basic create action but leaves critical details about what constitutes a 'startup page', how 'mainWebsite' affects behavior, and what the response/return value will be. The tool is not fully usable from this description alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description names no parameters at all. The important parameters 'mainWebsite' and 'sharedToEntireTeam' are completely unexplained, leaving their meaning dependent on bare field names and enum values. The description fails to compensate for the lack of schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Create') with a clear resource ('startup pages') and a batch limit ('up to 10'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_homepages, update_homepage, and delete_homepages. It directly states what the tool does without ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'in one call' implies a batch usage context, but the description does not explicitly state when to prefer this tool over alternatives or mention any exclusions. No sibling tool comparison is provided, leaving usage guidance mostly implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.