mcp-proxy

by sokunmin

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

Python

Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-proxy

No user-submitted related servers found.

Related Servers

MasterMCP
HC010602
-
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
MCP server
Updated a year ago (2025-05-30 09:28 UTC)
-
Atrax
Agent Orchestration Developer Tools
metcalfc
F
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
Proxy that aggregates multiple MCP servers and presents them as a unified interface, allowing clients to access resources from multiple servers transparently.
Updated a year ago (2025-04-04 23:33 UTC)
4
-
mcp_demo
ropon
A
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
mcp demo ip query
Updated a year ago (2025-04-07 01:57 UTC)
Apache 2.0
mcp-meilisearch
Search
falcosan
F
license
Not graded
quality
Not graded
maintenance
mcp-meilisearch
Updated 9 months ago (2026-01-08 11:35 UTC)
3 npm
-
mcprouter
Cloud Platforms
chatmcp
A
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
A proxy service that connects MCP clients to remote MCP servers, allowing users to use server keys from MCP.so to access remote resources without running their own server.
Updated a year ago (2025-06-03 08:52 UTC)
32 npm
4
MIT
mcp-tool-search
Developer Tools Agent Orchestration
ericnunes30
A
license
Not graded
quality
B
maintenance
A standalone MCP gateway/proxy server that lets any MCP-compatible client search and call tools across multiple downstream MCP servers through a single mcp proxy tool.
Updated a month ago (2026-08-28 19:44 UTC)
23 npm
MIT

Deploy Server

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

B3.1/5.0

Scored 2026-04-18 09:35 across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools, as there are no other tools to compare it to. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tool names to be inconsistent with. The name 'fetch' is straightforward and follows a common verb pattern.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool is generally too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and flexibility. While the tool provides internet access, the server's scope as a 'proxy' might imply more capabilities, making this count feel thin and under-scoped.

Completeness2/5

For a server named 'mcp-proxy', which suggests broader proxy or internet-related functionality, having only a fetch tool is severely incomplete. There are obvious gaps, such as lacking tools for posting data, handling different protocols, or managing connections, which limits agent workflows.