Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SiteGraph

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to investigate public URLs through evidence-first intelligence, including crawling, entity resolution, social discovery, SEO, technology detection, monitoring, reports, and optional AI reasoning.
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to investigate any website's technology stack, identifying CMS, ecommerce platforms, JavaScript frameworks, analytics, CRM, marketing automation, payments, chat, CDN, and hosting.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets an MCP client collect the marketing evidence behind any URL — ad libraries, social, SEO, pixels, founders, Reddit, positioning history — as a token-cheap scorecard plus citable evidence index and unknowns. Enables the agent to fetch specific evidence, follow a per-channel analysis method, validate citations and grounding, and produce a step-by-step playbook for copying the growth engine.
      29
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run domain and website intelligence checks, including WHOIS/RDAP, DNS and email security, TLS headers, subdomains, tech stack, contacts, SEO, Core Web Vitals, sitemaps, and Wayback page diffs, using the caller's own Apify token.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools have mostly distinct scopes: claim_timeline operates on a claim, url_timeline on a URL, fact_checks searches an API, claimreview_from_url parses a specific article, and image_provenance handles C2PA data. Some overlap exists because claim_timeline aggregates across URLs and fact-checks, but the descriptions make the boundaries reasonably clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use lowercase snake_case and are descriptively noun-based, which is consistent enough to be predictable. Minor deviations are claimreview_from_url (prepositional suffix) and fact_checks (plural), but the overall naming style is coherent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for an investigative claim/archive-provenance server, and each tool maps to a distinct research need. There is no obvious filler or missing major workflow at this size.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers claim timelines, URL archive timelines, fact-check search, ClaimReview extraction, and image provenance, which is strong coverage for the domain. Minor gaps remain, such as direct source/URL discovery or batch investigation helpers, but core workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues