SiteGraph
Related Servers
Alternatives to SiteGraph
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to investigate public URLs through evidence-first intelligence, including crawling, entity resolution, social discovery, SEO, technology detection, monitoring, reports, and optional AI reasoning.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to audit websites with live measurements, find public contact emails, check SSL expiry, and draft verifiable outreach messages.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to investigate any website's technology stack, identifying CMS, ecommerce platforms, JavaScript frameworks, analytics, CRM, marketing automation, payments, chat, CDN, and hosting.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLets an MCP client collect the marketing evidence behind any URL — ad libraries, social, SEO, pixels, founders, Reddit, positioning history — as a token-cheap scorecard plus citable evidence index and unknowns. Enables the agent to fetch specific evidence, follow a per-channel analysis method, validate citations and grounding, and produce a step-by-step playbook for copying the growth engine.29MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides tools for AI agents to audit websites, including stack detection, DNS snapshots, and security checks.85 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to run domain and website intelligence checks, including WHOIS/RDAP, DNS and email security, TLS headers, subdomains, tech stack, contacts, SEO, Core Web Vitals, sitemaps, and Wayback page diffs, using the caller's own Apify token.11MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
The tools have mostly distinct scopes: claim_timeline operates on a claim, url_timeline on a URL, fact_checks searches an API, claimreview_from_url parses a specific article, and image_provenance handles C2PA data. Some overlap exists because claim_timeline aggregates across URLs and fact-checks, but the descriptions make the boundaries reasonably clear.
All tool names use lowercase snake_case and are descriptively noun-based, which is consistent enough to be predictable. Minor deviations are claimreview_from_url (prepositional suffix) and fact_checks (plural), but the overall naming style is coherent.
Five tools is well-scoped for an investigative claim/archive-provenance server, and each tool maps to a distinct research need. There is no obvious filler or missing major workflow at this size.
The surface covers claim timelines, URL archive timelines, fact-check search, ClaimReview extraction, and image provenance, which is strong coverage for the domain. Minor gaps remain, such as direct source/URL discovery or batch investigation helpers, but core workflows are supported.