get_rasi_phalalu

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description details the deterministic nature and calculation basis for each line, stating 'every line maps to a calculation.' No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden; it is transparent about the algorithmic behavior without covering all edge cases.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single paragraph that efficiently conveys purpose and key details. It front-loads the main function and lists args. Slightly dense but no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 8 parameters and an output schema (provided separately), the description covers the process and what the output contains. It addresses the complexity of the tool by explaining the calculation-driven output, making it complete for agent understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must explain parameters. It provides formats (date=YYYY-MM-DD, janma_rasi='Mesha'), lists ayanamsa options, and explains the optional janma_nakshatra adds a tarabalam line. City and coordinates are mentioned but not latitude/longitude explicitly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it provides a 'daily Rasi Phalalu' reading for a janma rasi, based on computed facts. It lists specific components like chandrabalam, gochara verdicts, Sade Sati, and tarabalam. This distinguishes it from sibling tools, which cover different astrological calculations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the tool is for daily readings and specifies required arguments (date, janma_rasi). It implies when to use it (for Vedic horoscope predictions) but does not explicitly exclude alternatives like get_panchangam or get_gochara.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.