probely_configure_sequence_login

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'enable or disable' without disclosing side effects, error conditions, or permissions. The mutation nature is implied but not detailed, leaving significant behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences, no fluff. The action verb is front-loaded, and every word adds value. Optimal length for a simple toggle tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of an output schema (not shown) and the tool's simplicity, the description covers basic functionality. However, it omits parameter semantics and does not clarify the relationship with sibling tools like probely_create_sequence or probely_update_sequence, leaving moderate gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It does not describe targetId (likely the sequence ID) or the enabled parameter's effect. The vagueness forces reliance on parameter names alone, which may cause confusion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: enabling or disabling sequence-based login. It distinguishes from siblings like probely_configure_form_login by specifying 'sequence-based' and provides a usage hint ('after creating a login sequence').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly directs to call this after creating a login sequence, providing clear temporal context. It does not specify when not to use it or name alternative tools, but the guidance is sufficient for an agent to infer the intended usage scenario.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.