get_api_for-path

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description is minimal. It does not disclose what the tool returns (e.g., methods, classes), any side effects, or required permissions, leaving the agent with insufficient behavioral understanding.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief (only 4 words), but this is underspecification rather than conciseness. It lacks crucial details about usage and output, making it insufficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and annotations, and the presence of many sibling tools, the description is far from complete. It does not explain what the tool returns or how to interpret results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 67% schema description coverage, the description adds no additional meaning to the parameters. The schema already describes 'class' and 'method', but the 'required' parameter (an array) is unclear and not explained further.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Node.js API: Path' clearly indicates the tool retrieves API information for the Node.js path module. However, it does not distinguish it from sibling tools like 'get_api_for-fs' which also target specific modules.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the many sibling tools that target other Node.js modules. The description lacks any context about alternatives or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.