Skip to main content
Glama
snickery

loki-tail-mcp

by snickery

Related Servers

Alternatives to loki-tail-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to query and analyze logs from Grafana Loki using LogQL, supporting label discovery and keyword search.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables natural-language querying of Grafana logs by automatically detecting log sources and service labels. It provides read-only access to log data with intelligent caching for efficient repeat queries.
      38 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI assistants to query Grafana/Loki logs and Thanos/Prometheus metrics directly from MCP-compatible clients like Cursor or Claude Desktop.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables querying logs and metrics from Graylog, Prometheus, and InfluxDB 2.x. It provides tools for executing Lucene log searches, PromQL queries, and Flux queries directly within MCP-compatible clients.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only stdio MCP server that provides a generic log-querying layer for Grafana/Loki, enabling discovery, retrieval, and aggregation of logs (raw, slow, errors, volumes) through 15 tools, with hard limits on data volume and no built-in business logic.
      15
      8 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. The two query tools (instant vs range) are explicitly differentiated in their descriptions, and the discovery/analysis tools (labels, patterns, volume, fields, containers) do not overlap. Even tail_container is clearly a convenience wrapper for a specific use case.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Six of nine tools follow a consistent loki_verb_noun pattern (query_instant, query_range, tail_container, list_labels, list_label_values, list_containers). Three tools (patterns, log_volume, detected_fields) use noun phrases, breaking the verb-first convention. This is a minor inconsistency that doesn't hinder usability.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is a well-scoped number for a Loki exploration server. Each tool serves a distinct purpose without redundancy, covering querying, metadata discovery, log analysis, and container navigation. The count is neither too small nor overwhelming.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full range of Loki interactions: instant queries, range queries, metadata discovery (labels, values), container listing and tailing, pattern mining, volume ranking, and field detection for parsing. There are no obvious gaps for a read-only log exploration workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues