No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 20 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct scopes (single-page scan, journey scan, HTML snippet scan, vision audit, fix verification, diffing). The main overlap is between the focused checkers (check_color_contrast, check_aria) and the broader scan_page/scan_html, which also surface those findings — but careful descriptions clarify when to reach for the narrow tools versus the full scan.
Names are mostly verb_noun (scan_page, verify_fix, start_audit, add_site, list_sites, get_rules, generate_report_pdf). A handful invert to noun/qualifier + verb (flow_scan, diff_scan, visual_audit), which is a minor deviation but still readable and predictable.
At 20 tools this is on the heavier side, but the breadth (page/journey/HTML/vision scanning, fixing, verification, history, reporting, account and widget management) justifies the surface. Each tool maps to a distinct capability rather than padding, so it stays reasonable for the scope.
The set covers the full accessibility lifecycle: find (scan_page, flow_scan, scan_html, visual_audit), diagnose (check_color_contrast, check_aria, detect_framework, get_rules, find_source), fix (generate_ai_fix), verify (verify_fix, diff_scan), persist/report (scan_history, generate_report_pdf, start_audit/get_audit), plus site/widget/account management. No obvious dead ends.