Skip to main content
Glama
snapsynapse

AI Incident Law

by snapsynapse
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to AI Incident Law

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Law7 MCP

      mikhashev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with up-to-date legal documents from official sources, enabling accurate legal information retrieval and analysis.
      18
      AGPL 3.0

    • Clearon AI Legal Watch MCP

      kwgoodwin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables review-gated, local-first monitoring of AI legislation, regulations, litigation, sanctions, court rules, and ethics guidance by collecting and verifying leads from official sources, managing human review workflows, and generating digests and exports.
      MIT

    • ai-orders-agent

      legalrealist
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying and filtering a read-only dataset of AI-related court orders with full-text search, facets, and record retrieval via MCP, OpenAPI, or REST endpoints.
      MIT

    • Open Legal Compliance MCP

      TCoder920
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and analyze legal documents from multiple jurisdictions including US federal and state law, case law, EU regulations, UK legislation, Canadian law, Congress bills, SEC filings, and FDA data through free government APIs.
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (list vs search vs get), and descriptions clarify source vs generated records. However, get_authority clearly overlaps with get_obligation_first_record, since the latter explicitly handles 'authority' records by kind and graph ID, creating real ambiguity about which to use for an authority. list_authorities vs list_records is milder but also potentially confusable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All eight tool names use consistent snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, search_). Compound nouns vary in length but the convention is uniform throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a specialized legal/incident data server. Each tool covers a distinct capability (datasets, listing, search, source retrieval, authority retrieval, staleness) and none feels redundant beyond the noted authority overlap.

    Completeness4/5

    The read surface is solid: dataset summaries, filtered listing, full-text search, source record retrieval, generated record retrieval, and a staleness/verification report. It lacks explicit pagination or enumeration helpers (e.g. list jurisdictions/domains) but core discovery and retrieval workflows are covered with no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources