Skip to main content
Glama
open-india-law-mcp

open-india-law-mcp

by smridhiwho

Related Servers

Alternatives to open-india-law-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Grounds external agents in public Indian judgments and statutes through MCP, enabling legal search and bounded document packets without requiring the full Roop platform.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for searching and retrieving Pakistani federal statutes and Supreme Court judgments with structured citations, using static HuggingFace datasets.
      6
      40 PyPI
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for the CourtMesh public API that enables AI clients to search and analyze Indian court case law, covering over 310 million case records from the Supreme Court, High Courts, District Courts, and tribunals.
      12
      254 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search over Polish court judgments and legislative acts via MCP. Allows LLMs to retrieve legal documents using natural language queries.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients to research official Turkish legal sources locally by searching judicial decisions, legislation, and Constitutional Court decisions, and by retrieving legal documents, individual articles, and legislation structures.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects LLMs to the EcourtsIndia Partner API for searching Indian court cases, retrieving orders, reading cause lists, and accessing AI summaries.
      9
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct function: catalog discovery, schema inspection, raw SQL, legislation search, act retrieval, regulation search, judgment search, and judgment reassembly. The search_* and get_* pairs are cleanly separated, and run_sql is explicitly framed as a lower-level alternative rather than a competing high-level search tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_catalog, get_schema, run_sql, search_legislation, get_act, search_regulations, search_judgments, get_judgment. The naming convention is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a legal research server: three low-level data-access tools and five domain-specific search/retrieval tools. Each tool earns its place and the count is neither thin nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Legislation has both search and full-act retrieval, judgments have search and full-judgment reassembly, and regulations have search but no dedicated get_regulation tool analogous to get_act. That is a minor gap, though an agent can work around it using run_sql.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues