llmkit-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to llmkit-mcp-server
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Google Cloud services including billing cost analysis, log querying, and metrics monitoring through natural language commands. Provides comprehensive tools for managing GCP resources, analyzing costs, detecting anomalies, and retrieving operational insights.401Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and analyzing AWS cost and usage data through the AWS Cost Explorer API. Supports cost comparisons, forecasting, dimension filtering, and cost change driver analysis with streamable HTTP deployment to Amazon Bedrock Agentcore Runtime.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for unified cost tracking and analysis across AWS, OpenAI, and Anthropic. It enables users to query expenditures, compare costs across providers, and analyze usage trends through natural language.10MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying Langfuse analytics, cost metrics, and usage data across multiple projects. Provides tools for trace analysis, model/service cost breakdowns, and daily usage trends through natural language queries.2465 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides real-time AI compute pricing and cost analysis across LLM providers, enabling session cost tracking, model price comparisons, and historical data queries.2286 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to pre-flight estimate query costs, enforce hard budgets, reconcile actual billed spend, and suggest cheaper rewrites across BigQuery, Snowflake, and Databricks.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides tools for Claude to query local Claude Code token usage and cost data, enabling spend analysis and insights through natural language.5 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceTracks AI agent token usage and spending in real time, with budget alerts, per-task cost breakdown, and a visual dashboard.61MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to track LLM costs, enforce budgets, compare models, and estimate expenses through simple tool calls.-
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Tools are mostly distinct, targeting different aspects like budget, cost breakdown, health, keys, local session, etc. However, llmkit_cost_query, llmkit_usage_stats, and llmkit_session_summary have overlapping purposes (cost/spend/usage data) which could cause some confusion.
All tools follow a consistent pattern with the 'llmkit_' prefix and descriptive noun phrases separated by underscores, e.g., llmkit_budget_status, llmkit_cost_query. No mixing of conventions.
With 11 tools, the count is well within the recommended 3-15 range. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of proxy cost monitoring and management, justifying its inclusion.
The tool surface covers major monitoring needs: health, budget, cost, keys, sessions, and local attribution. However, it lacks management capabilities (e.g., create/update keys or budgets) and could include actions like setting usage limits, which are minor gaps for a read-only analytics server.