Scored across 11 tools
Tools are mostly distinct, targeting different aspects like budget, cost breakdown, health, keys, local session, etc. However, llmkit_cost_query, llmkit_usage_stats, and llmkit_session_summary have overlapping purposes (cost/spend/usage data) which could cause some confusion.
All tools follow a consistent pattern with the 'llmkit_' prefix and descriptive noun phrases separated by underscores, e.g., llmkit_budget_status, llmkit_cost_query. No mixing of conventions.
With 11 tools, the count is well within the recommended 3-15 range. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of proxy cost monitoring and management, justifying its inclusion.
The tool surface covers major monitoring needs: health, budget, cost, keys, sessions, and local attribution. However, it lacks management capabilities (e.g., create/update keys or budgets) and could include actions like setting usage limits, which are minor gaps for a read-only analytics server.