Skip to main content
Glama

call_tool_read

Read-onlyDestructive

Execute read-only tools like search, query, or list by specifying the exact tool name and arguments. Use after retrieving available tools to safely access data.

Instructions

Execute a READ-ONLY tool. WORKFLOW: 1) Call retrieve_tools first to find tools, 2) Use the exact 'name' field from results. DECISION RULE: Use this when the tool name contains: search, query, list, get, fetch, find, check, view, read, show, describe, lookup, retrieve, browse, explore, discover, scan, inspect, analyze, examine, validate, verify. Examples: search_files, get_user, list_repositories, query_database, find_issues, check_status. This is the DEFAULT choice when unsure - most tools are read-only.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
argsNoArguments to pass to the upstream tool as a native JSON object. Refer to the tool's inputSchema from retrieve_tools for required parameters. Example: {"path": "src/index.ts", "limit": 20}. This is the preferred parameter — it eliminates JSON escaping overhead. Use 'args_json' only if your client cannot produce nested JSON objects.
args_jsonNoLegacy: arguments as a pre-serialized JSON string. Prefer the 'args' parameter instead — it accepts a native JSON object and eliminates escaping overhead. If both are provided, 'args_json' wins for backward compatibility.
intent_data_sensitivityNoClassify data being accessed: public, internal, private, or unknown. Helps track sensitive data access patterns.
intent_reasonNoWhy is this tool being called? Provide context like 'User asked to check status' or 'Gathering data for report'.
nameYesTool name in format 'server:tool' (e.g., 'github:get_user'). CRITICAL: You MUST use exact names from retrieve_tools results - do NOT guess or invent server names. Unknown servers will fail.
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description claims the tool is 'READ-ONLY', but the annotations include destructiveHint: true, which directly contradicts this. The agent receives conflicting signals about whether this tool mutates state. There is no disclosure of the destructive behavior hinted in annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is moderately structured with workflow and decision rule sections but is verbose (e.g., long list of example keywords). Some redundancy exists (multiple mentions of using retrieve_tools). Could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers workflow and when-to-use but omits any mention of return values or behavior (e.g., what the response looks like). Given no output schema, this is a gap. The openWorldHint annotation is not addressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with detailed descriptions for all 5 parameters. The description adds marginal value, like workflow context for choosing 'args' over 'args_json', but this is already covered in the schema. No significant enhancement beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states it executes a READ-ONLY tool and provides a clear workflow ('call retrieve_tools first') along with a decision rule listing keywords that indicate read-only nature. It distinguishes this from sibling tools by implication (contrast with destructive/write tools).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use criteria (tool name contains specific keywords) and states it's the default choice when unsure. It instructs to call retrieve_tools for discovery and use exact names, which guides correct invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server