browser_new_tab
Open a new browser tab with a specified URL, or default to a blank page.
Instructions
Open a new browser tab.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | No | URL to open (default: about:blank) |
Open a new browser tab with a specified URL, or default to a blank page.
Open a new browser tab.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | No | URL to open (default: about:blank) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only says 'Open a new browser tab' without disclosing behavior like focus change, popup handling, or failure modes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundancy, efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal description for a simple tool; lacks details on return value and side effects, but adequate given low complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers parameter fully; description adds no extra meaning beyond the action. Baseline 3 for 100% coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'Open' and resource 'new browser tab'. Distinct from sibling tools like browser_navigate and browser_switch_tab.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like browser_navigate or browser_switch_tab. Missed opportunity to clarify context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/smankoo/open-browser-control'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server