Skip to main content
Glama
small-tou

MCP Test Server

by small-tou

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
add_userC

添加新用户

search_usersC

搜索用户

create_todoC

创建待办事项

calculateC

执行数学计算

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription
user_analysis用户数据分析提示
todo_summary待办事项摘要提示
system_report系统状态报告提示
code_review代码审查提示模板

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription
用户列表获取所有用户数据
待办事项获取所有待办事项数据
配置信息系统配置信息
系统日志查看系统操作日志

TDQS

C2.7/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: add_user and search_users handle user management, calculate performs mathematical operations, and create_todo manages tasks. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these domains, making tool selection straightforward.

Naming Consistency4/5

Three tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (add_user, create_todo, search_users), but 'calculate' deviates by using only a verb without a noun. This minor inconsistency slightly reduces predictability, though the naming remains readable and functional.

Tool Count3/5

With only 4 tools, the server feels thin and under-scoped for a general 'Test Server' purpose, lacking coverage in areas like updates, deletions, or broader operations. While each tool is distinct, the count is borderline low for typical server functionality.

Completeness2/5

The tool set is severely incomplete for user and task management domains. For users, there is no update_user or delete_user, and for todos, no get_todo, update_todo, or delete_todo. This creates significant gaps that will likely cause agent failures in common workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues