The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one writes/persists context and the other reads/lists context. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: save_context and read_context. The naming is predictable and clear.

With only two tools, the server is minimal but appropriately scoped for persisting and reading context files. It is slightly thin, but each tool serves a distinct and necessary function.

The core save/read workflow is covered, including listing topics via read_context when no topic is provided. An explicit delete/update tool is missing, but saving can overwrite existing context, so this is a minor gap.