Co-Reading MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Co-Reading MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables shared reading between humans and AI assistants, including book import, chunked reading, margin annotations, reading progress tracking, and note exchange.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that gives Claude a durable reading room for EPUB and plain text books, enabling chunk-by-chunk navigation, annotations, progress tracking, and shared margin cards.26114MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to help users manage their reading experience by searching books, tracking reading progress, managing bookmarks, and generating personalized recommendations and summaries.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read and navigate EPUB files through 13 specialized tools for pagination, full-text search, metadata access, and footnote resolution. Supports session-based reading with table of contents navigation and chapter summaries.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA 4-stage reading companion that helps users set reading goals, discover books, track progress, and deepen learning through reflection, integrated with Claude Desktop.211MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables local EPUB reading with AI agents, supporting annotations, parallel editions, and MCP tools.7AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Most tools are clearly separated by domain, but the card-related tools (reading_card_inbox, reading_card_collection, reading_list_cards) have overlapping 'show/list collected cards' semantics and could be misselected. The import, chunk-reading, and annotation flows are otherwise fairly distinct.
All tools share a consistent reading_ prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern such as reading_import_book and reading_read_chunk. Minor deviations like reading_card_inbox/reading_card_collection and the bare reading_continue keep it from a perfect score, but the naming convention is predictable.
26 tools is on the heavier side, though it covers several distinct subdomains: import, reading, annotations, notes, and cards. It sits just past the '16-25 feels heavy' borderline and could benefit from consolidation, but no tool appears truly redundant.
The set covers the core co-reading lifecycle: import books, read chunks, track progress, find/search passages, annotate, reply, submit human notes, and collect/review cards. Missing delete/update operations for books and annotations are minor gaps rather than blockers for the main workflow.