Skip to main content
Glama
slosar

mu-mcp

by slosar

Related Servers

Alternatives to mu-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables local LLMs to search email via mu, keeping all data on-device for privacy.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Reads and searches local email archives (.mbox or .eml) with full MIME parsing, enabling queries about senders, subjects, dates, and bodies while keeping all data on your machine.
      3
      127 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and page through local Thunderbird mbox mail, read message bodies and attachments with SHA-256 verification, open native compose windows, create native drafts, and send explicitly authorized email through existing Thunderbird identities over MCP stdio. Queries stay read-only and never modify the mbox, while account authentication and real delivery remain with Thunderbird.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a local notmuch email database to an LLM client such as Claude. It is read-first: searching, reading, and understanding mail is always available; writing anything (drafts, tags, exported files) requires an explicit opt-in flag and is confined to clearly bounded locations.
      13
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to search and read email from a notmuch archive, providing tools for searching threads, retrieving messages, and listing tags through an MCP endpoint.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only search and retrieval of your email across multiple IMAP accounts through a local notmuch index, served over authenticated HTTP for MCP clients like Claude or Codex.
      11
      17
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    search_mail returns metadata records while read_mail returns message content, so their core actions are distinct. However, both accept mu queries and an agent might initially attempt to use search_mail for reading, though descriptions clarify the limitations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern: search_mail and read_mail. The convention is clear and consistently applied.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is quite thin for a mailbox server; while the read-only scope justifies minimalism, common operations like listing folders or fetching full messages are absent. The count feels borderline rather than well-scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers basic search and read, but read_mail truncates output and there is no way to retrieve full messages or attachments. These are notable gaps for a mail retrieval tool, though read-only limits some expected operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues