Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to loom

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, cloud-based memory for AI agents, letting them remember preferences, skills, and decisions across sessions via an MCP-compatible interface.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to maintain a persistent identity and structured memory—including reasoning patterns, episodic history, and knowledge—while exposing procedures for managing that memory over MCP.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides persistent memory for AI agents via MCP, enabling agents to store and access notes, files, and session context across sessions and clients while under user control.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables self-hosted, persistent AI identity and long-term memory across clients, models, and agent surfaces, with multi-resident isolation, shared world knowledge, governed memory writes, correction and forgetting, keyword or optional semantic recall, and MCP or HTTP access.
      44
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to maintain persistent memory across sessions by capturing conversations, extracting durable knowledge, and injecting relevant context, supporting various MCP-compatible platforms.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with persistent, human-like memory infrastructure via MCP, enabling them to store, search, summarize, and forget episodic, semantic, procedural, and working memories across sessions.
      618 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 43 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set groups cleanly into memory, knowledge, person, identity, and harness domains, and descriptions draw clear lines between similar operations. However, 43 tools create many near-pairs (archive/restore/merge/history across three resources, plus unprefixed verbs like update/forget/recall), so an agent must read descriptions carefully to avoid misselection. Overlap exists but is largely mitigated by documentation.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools use snake_case with a domain prefix (memory_*, knowledge_*, person_*, harness_*), which is predictable. But core memory operations break the pattern with bare verbs/nouns (remember, recall, update, forget, identity, episodes, dossier, bootstrap), and some related tools differ in structure (update vs update_identity). Mixed conventions but still readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    43 tools is far above the typical 3–15 range and exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many' in the rubric. While the server covers a broad multi-domain scope (memory, knowledge, person, identity, harness), bundling all of them into one surface increases selection cost. Some lifecycle tools could be consolidated or split into separate servers.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers full lifecycle operations for memories, knowledge pages, person cards, identity, and harness scaffolding, including create/read/update/archive/restore/history/merge/verify. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit harness list/remove or global cross-domain search, but core workflows have no dead ends. Overall a very complete but heavyweight tool set.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues