FlightPlan
Related Servers
Alternatives to FlightPlan
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceShared, versioned memory and governance control plane for AI coding agents. Compiler pipeline resolves architectural decision conflicts across Claude Code, Cursor, and custom agent fleets.36MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceOne shared project for your team's Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode agents: a task board, decisions and handoffs. Everyone keeps their own plan.1357-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceCoordination layer for AI coding agents working on the same codebase. Adds file locks, shared project memory, and cross-machine file sync so Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and other MCP agents stop overwriting each other.52Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMultiplayer coordination for AI coding agents: Claude Code, Codex CLI and Cursor share one room per repository. An agent claims a path glob before it edits and a conflicting claim is refused at claim time, so collisions are prevented rather than resolved at merge. Metadata only — source code and diffs never leave the machine.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to share project memory, rules, and live coordination so they can see each other's changes and avoid conflicts before writing code. It provides local-first context and impact notifications across agents and sessions.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables teams of coding agents to share one live plan synced through their existing git remote, so each agent receives teammates' contract, decision, and task changes at its next tool call. Provides tools for publishing contracts, logging decisions, adding and claiming tasks, and reviewing the plan for contradictions.712 npm4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
The six tools have mostly clear lifecycle boundaries: post, update, complete, get, list, and mark landed. However, list_intents is overloaded with three distinct modes (pre-planning semantic check, glob collision check, context search), and collision/overlap results also surface from post_intent and update_intent, which could make tool selection less immediate despite detailed guidance.
All tool names use snake_case and a predictable verb_object pattern: list_intents, post_intent, complete_intent, get_intent, mark_intent_landed, update_intent. The lone four-word name, mark_intent_landed, is still consistent and readable.
Six tools are well-scoped for an intent registry: create, list/query, fetch, update, complete, and mark landed. Each tool earns its place without obvious redundancy or missing lifecycle operations.
The surface covers the full lifecycle for work intents: registration, search/listing, detail retrieval, mid-flight updates and TTL renewal, completion with outcome, and post-completion landing correction. No obvious CRUD or workflow gap remains for the stated domain.