Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
CellarTracker MCP

CellarTracker MCP

by slavins-co
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to CellarTracker MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • claudex-strava-mcp

      mossydidar
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Claude to your Strava fitness data, enabling natural language queries about your training history such as activities, stats, and routes.
      8
      -

    • paperless-mcp

      tiziano5
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Claude to a self-hosted Paperless-ngx document archive, enabling natural language search, retrieval, and taxonomy browsing of documents.
      MIT

    • Whoop MCP Server

      mohamedfaiz3020
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Connects your Whoop health data to Claude, enabling natural language queries about recovery, sleep, strain, and workouts.
      21 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools target distinct data views (cellar wines, individual bottles, consumption history, tasting notes, deliveries, orders), and descriptions explicitly differentiate similar pairs like purchase-history vs recent-deliveries. A few overlaps remain (search-cellar vs bottle-details when filtering by wine name), but overall boundaries are clear.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use kebab-case, but conventions are mixed: some start with verbs (get-wishlist, search-cellar, refresh-data) while most are noun phrases (drinking-recommendations, cellar-stats). The inconsistency is noticeable though names remain readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a wine cellar query server. Each tool covers a distinct retrieval need without obvious redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    The read-only surface is fairly thorough for searching and analyzing cellar data, but there are no tools to add, update, or delete wines, wishlist items, or tasting notes. This is a notable gap for a CellarTracker management domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources